1. 26/11 case: High Court says it will hear CIC as Maharashtra government opposes order against Maria

26/11 case: High Court says it will hear CIC as Maharashtra government opposes order against Maria

The state government had approached the high court challenging a July 2014 order passed by the then state Chief Information Commissioner Ratnakar Gaikwad, directing the government to institute an inquiry headed by a sitting or retired judge under the Commission of Inquiry Act.

By: | Mumbai | Published: June 6, 2017 7:02 PM
Bombay High Court, Bombay HC to hear maharashtra state CIC side, Transparency panel's order to initiate inquiry against retired top cop Rakesh Maria, Rakesh Maria news, alleged discrepancies in the 26/11 call records Rakesh Maria is allegedly involved in discrepancies in the 26/11 call records(PTI)

The Bombay High Court today said it wants to hear the state CIC’s side as it took up Maharashtra government’s petition challenging the transparency panel’s order to initiate inquiry against retired top cop Rakesh Maria in connection with alleged discrepancies in the 26/11 call records. The state government had approached the high court challenging a July 2014 order passed by the then state Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) Ratnakar Gaikwad, directing the government to institute an inquiry headed by a sitting or retired judge under the Commission of Inquiry Act. A division bench of Justices N H Patil and Bharti Dangre today directed government pleader Abhinandan Vagyani to inform the state CIC’s office about the petition. The commissioner had ordered that the inquiry be carried out against Maria as to why misleading information was provided to Vinita Kamte, wife of additional commissioner of police Ashok Kamte who was killed in the 26/11 terror attacks. Vinita had sought call data records of the police control room on the night of November 26, 2008 when 10 terrorists attacked various spots in Mumbai.

According to Vinita, the information given to her by the police was fake and did not match the original call data records submitted by the police before the court which conducted trial in the 26/11 case. “The commissioner’s office will have to be apprised of such a petition. We will have to hear their side also while deciding this petition,” Justice Patil said and posted the petition for further hearing on June 15. The state government, in its petition, claimed that the CIC does not have the powers to direct the government to initiate an inquiry under the Commission of Inquiry Act. “At the most, the commissioner can only impose penalty or hold some officer responsible for not providing information to the applicant,” Vagyani said. Maria, as then joint commissioner of police (crime branch), had led the probe into the brazen terror assault and was heading the police control room for some time during the 72-hour siege in November 2008.

Also Watch:

Vinita had under RTI sought call logs of wireless conversations between the control room and Kamte’s van in which he was killed along with Maharashtra ATS chief Hemant Karkare and encounter specialist Vijay Salaskar. She had alleged that the details were first denied to her. However, when the information was provided in November 2009 and February 2010, there were “serious discrepancies”. Gaikwad, in his three-page scathing order, had said that the information sought by Vinita was available but still was “deliberately” not shared and delays were caused.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top