Why did the Election Commission Skip Uploading Form 17C?

–By Manish Kumar Tiwary

The Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, are integral to maintaining the integrity and transparency of India’s electoral process. These rules encompass various aspects of election conduct, including the maintenance of Forms 17A and 17C. Form 17A is essential for documenting the details of each voter who enters a polling booth and casts their vote, ensuring every voter’s presence is officially recorded and preventing fraudulent activities. Form 17C is divided into two parts, each serving critical functions. Part I records the unique identification number of the Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) used at a polling booth, the total number of registered voters, the number of validated voters, non-voting voters, disallowed votes, test votes, and the total votes recorded. Part II is dedicated to recording the election results. Under Rule 49S (2) of the Conduct of Election Rules, the presiding officer must provide a copy of the data entered in Part I of Form 17C to the polling agents of the candidates at the close of polling. This provision ensures transparency, allowing candidates and their agents to verify the recorded data, thereby fostering trust in the electoral process.

The meticulous documentation and procedures outlined in these rules exemplify India’s commitment to upholding democratic principles, with Forms 17A and 17C playing pivotal roles in ensuring accountability and credibility in elections. Form 17C data is critically important in the electoral process as it provides a verifiable record of votes cast at each polling station. This data includes essential details such as the unique ID number of the EVM and the number of votes polled. Candidates rely on this data during the vote counting process to ensure accuracy and transparency. If discrepancies arise between the data recorded in Form 17C and the data reported by the counting center, candidates have the right to challenge the results. This can involve immediate objections during the counting process or filing petitions in the high court to contest the election results based on mismatches between the counted votes and the figures documented in Form 17C. This mechanism not only ensures accountability but also reinforces the integrity of the electoral process, providing candidates with a robust means to address potential irregularities and uphold democratic principles.

The data recorded in Form 17C is of paramount importance in maintaining the transparency and credibility of the electoral process in India. This form serves as a critical document that captures essential details about the votes cast at each polling station. Form 17C is divided into two parts, with Part I detailing the unique identification number of the EVM used, the total number of voters enlisted at the polling booth, the number of voters who entered the polling booth and whose details were validated on Form 17A, the number of voters who did not vote despite signing on the register, the number of voters who were not allowed to vote, the number of test votes, and the total number of votes recorded in the EVM. Part II is used to record the election results.

Candidates and their agents rely on the data in Form 17C to verify the accuracy of the vote count during the counting process. The data recorded in this form is shared with the polling agents of all candidates at the close of polling, as mandated by Rule 49S(2) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961. This ensures that all candidates have access to the same information, fostering a transparent and fair electoral process. If any discrepancies arise between the data recorded in Form 17C and the data reported by the counting center, candidates can challenge the results. They can file immediate objections during the counting process or file petitions in the high court to contest the election outcomes based on mismatches between the counted votes and the figures documented in Form 17C. This provision acts as a safeguard against potential electoral fraud and ensures the accountability of the electoral process.

The Election Commission of India (ECI) has emphasized the rigorous, transparent, and participative process of collecting and storing votes polled. The Commission’s officials across the states disseminate voter turnout data in the best possible manner, taking into account statutory considerations. The detailed process of recording and releasing turnout data and the manner of custody and usage of Form 17C are explained to political parties and made available in the public domain. The Commission also ensures that the voter turnout data is accessible to the public and candidates through the Voter Turnout App, which updates the data continuously from the start of polling until the data attains finality. This app provides real-time updates on voter turnout, making the electoral process more transparent and accessible to all stakeholders.

In summary, Form 17C data is a cornerstone of electoral transparency and integrity in India. It ensures that all candidates have access to accurate and verifiable information about the votes cast at each polling station. The provisions for sharing this data with candidates’ polling agents and the ability to challenge discrepancies in court reinforce the accountability and credibility of the electoral process, upholding the democratic principles upon which the Indian electoral system is built. The Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, serve as the backbone of India’s electoral system, ensuring that elections are conducted in a fair and transparent manner. Forms 17A and 17C are critical components of these rules, with each form serving distinct yet complementary purposes. Form 17A is used to document the presence of each voter at the polling booth, thereby preventing fraudulent voting. Form 17C, on the other hand, serves as the official record of the votes cast and the results of the election. By mandating the sharing of Form 17C data with polling agents, the rules promote transparency and trust in the electoral process. Additionally, the ability to challenge discrepancies in court provides a robust mechanism for addressing potential irregularities, further strengthening the integrity of India’s elections.

The author is PhD Scholar, Jamia Millia Islamia, Delhi.

(Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal and do not reflect the official position or policy of Financial Express Online. Reproducing this content without permission is prohibited.)