Acquiring a property, whether for commercial or residential purposes, represents a significant milestone in life. Therefore, it is crucial to comprehend the various forms of property ownership that exist in India. Each ownership type comes with its unique set of benefits and drawbacks.

Let us examine which option may be most suitable for your needs: freehold or leasehold property.

Freehold Property

In a freehold property arrangement, you possess complete ownership. This grants you the autonomy to manage the property as you see fit, including the rights to sell, transfer, or utilize it in any manner. Upon your passing, the property will be inherited by your legal heirs. Consequently, the rights to utilize, develop, and sell the property will be preserved within your family for future generations.

In India, the majority of properties are freehold; for instance, when a builder acquires land from a farmer, constructs a residential unit, and subsequently sells it to a buyer, the ownership rights originally held by the builder are entirely conveyed to the buyer. Transactions involving freehold properties are executed through a sale deed, conveyance deed, or property registration.

Also Read: Why Agricultural Land could be your next smart investment

Nandni Garg, Director at Rajdarbar Ventures, says, “Investing in a freehold property offers long-term security and stability. It not only provides the immediate benefit of property appreciation but also enhances the potential for future profits. With full ownership rights, investors gain complete control over their assets, making it a significant and sound financial decision.”

The foremost benefit of freehold property lies in complete ownership, which allows the owner the liberty to sell, lease, or utilize the property at their discretion whenever desired. Furthermore, freehold properties are regarded as a strong long-term investment, as their value generally increases over time. These properties also facilitate a smoother process for selling and transferring ownership, with reduced legal complications. Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages to consider. Freehold properties can be costly, necessitating full payment at the outset. In addition, the owner bears full responsibility for all maintenance and tax obligations, which can occasionally be significant.

Leasehold Property

In a leasehold property arrangement, the occupant is permitted to utilize the property for a predetermined duration without holding ownership rights. The ownership is retained by the state or a governmental entity, with lease terms generally spanning from 99 to 125 years or other designated intervals. At the conclusion of the lease, the landowner or leaseholder has the option to renegotiate or seek an extension; however, complete ownership is only conferred if explicit authorization is obtained.

Ajendra Singh, Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Spectrum Metro, explains, “Leasehold property can be a great option for those who wish to live in a location for a set period without committing to full ownership. From a business and financial perspective, it often proves to be a more affordable alternative.”

Leasehold properties present various benefits, such as a reduced initial financial commitment compared to freehold properties, which makes them more attainable for numerous purchasers. Throughout the lease term, tenants are entitled to utilize the property for a designated period. Nevertheless, there are considerable downsides. A primary concern is the absence of ownership; upon the lease’s conclusion, the property returns to the state. Furthermore, uncertainty can emerge as the lease nears its end, requiring tenants to either negotiate a new lease or leave the property, which may result in instability in their housing situation.

Rental Property

In a rental arrangement, tenants are required to pay a monthly fee for the use of the property, without acquiring any ownership rights. This arrangement is especially advantageous for those who value flexibility and do not plan to establish a permanent residence in a single location.

Nishith Thukral, Head of Leasing, Ambience Group, says, “Renting is ideal for those looking to embrace a more dynamic lifestyle. It provides an excellent solution for people who frequently relocate and do not feel the need for permanent ownership, allowing them to adapt to changing circumstances without the burden of long-term commitments.”

Rental properties present various benefits, such as the flexibility that enables tenants to relocate at their convenience, making them particularly suitable for individuals who frequently change cities or employment. Furthermore, tenants are generally less burdened by property maintenance responsibilities, which can alleviate stress significantly. Nevertheless, there are important drawbacks to take into account. Renters do not attain ownership of the property and are required to pay rent consistently, which complicates the process of building long-term assets.

Additionally, unlike freehold properties, rental properties do not appreciate in value, potentially limiting financial returns. Consequently, the choice between freehold, leasehold, and rental properties is a significant decision that necessitates thorough evaluation of one’s lifestyle, financial circumstances, and long-term objectives. By comprehending the distinctions among these property types and assessing individual situations, tenants can arrive at a well-informed decision that meets their needs and aspirations.