The Calcutta High Court on Thursday declined Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Suvendu Adhikari’s plea to stop the Trinamool Congress (TMC)’s “Sampriti” (harmony) rally scheduled for January 22, coinciding with the Ram Mandir inauguration in Ayodhya.
A division bench of Justices TS Sivagnanam and Justice Hiranmay Bhattacharyya heard the plea and questioned the connection between the harmony rally and the Ram Mandir inauguration while stressing the need for maintaining peace during the event in West Bengal.
Also Read:What’s inside Ayodhya Ram Mandir’s invitation kit – All details here
The court issued a directive that no speeches or expressions hurting the sentiments of any religious or sectarian group should be made during the rally.
“During the rally, no speech or utterances be made hurting the sentiments of a section of the people belonging to a particular religion or sect and this shall be scrupulously followed. All persons participating in the rally must be sensitised. If violence happens organisers must be held liable,” the Court ordered today, according to Bar and Bench.
The court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Adhikari, who moved court seeking a halt to the rally, expressing concerns about potential large-scale violence during the scheduled TMC rally in the state on January 22.
On Tuesday, Mamata Banerjee, Chief Minister of West Bengal refused to attend the Pran Pratishtha ceremony in Ayodhya and announced that she will be in Kolkata on January 22 and that she plans to offer prayers at a Kali temple and lead an interfaith rally.
Adhikari urged the Court to either prohibit the rally on January 22 or, as an alternative, deploy the military to prevent violence. The petitioner’s counsel argued, “Milords, they can have it on any other day; why the day of the inauguration of Ram Mandir?”
To which Chief Justice Sivagnam replied, “We can ask the State to provide adequate safeguards, no hates speech, etc. Rallies are not new in West Bengal.”
PM Modi releases six stamps on Ram Temple ahead of consecration
The court discarded the plea observing that political rallies could only be conducted with prior police permission and rejected the petitioner’s argument against holding the rally on January 22.
To address concerns about public inconvenience on a working day, the court issued an order: “It is the duty of the State and also the political party (TMC) to ensure that the common public is not affected on account of this rally or else it will lead to resentment in the minds of the public, who will be traveling on that day since it is a working day. Since instructions are given to district leaders of the party at all blocks, this may cause immense hardship to the public in the State. As of now, it appears no permission as such is granted to conduct rallies block-wise. Therefore, if any person is desirous to carry out such rally they will have to seek prior permission,” as Bar and Bench reported.