1. Supreme Court seeks builder’s response on plea to transfer defamation suit

Supreme Court seeks builder’s response on plea to transfer defamation suit

The Supreme Court has sought response from a Maharashtra-based real estate developer on a plea by a man, who had booked a flat in one of its projects, seeking transfer of a civil defamation suit filed against him by the builder.

By: | New Delhi | Published: September 17, 2017 10:22 AM
SC seeks builder's response, defamation suit, transfer defamation suit, plea to transfer defamation suit, builder's response on plea to transfer defamation suit, civil defamation suit, transfer of a civil defamation suit The Supreme Court has sought response from a Maharashtra-based real estate developer on a plea by a man, who had booked a flat in one of its projects, seeking transfer of a civil defamation suit filed against him by the builder. (Image: PTI)

The Supreme Court has sought response from a Maharashtra-based real estate developer on a plea by a man, who had booked a flat in one of its projects, seeking transfer of a civil defamation suit filed against him by the builder. A bench comprising justices R F Nariman and S K Kaul also stayed further proceedings in the defamation suit pending before a court in Maharashtra’s Thane district. The man approached the apex court seeking transfer of the suit pending in Thane to an appropriate court in Haryana’s Gurgaon and claimed that the builder filed a case against him as he had lodged complaints alleging delay in handing over the flat’s possession.

Vineet Malik, a resident of Gurgaon, said in his petition that he had booked the flat in ‘Ekta Parksville’ project of real estate firm Ekta Parksville Homes Pvt Ltd in November 2011. He alleged that despite taking about 95 per cent of the total consideration of the flat, the builder had extended the date of handing over the flat several times.

Malik claimed that due to the delay in handing over the flat, he wrote a number of e-mails and letters to the representatives of the builder but no satisfactory answer was given to him. He alleged that acting on his complaint, the Maharashtra Police started an investigation against the builder.

“As a counter blast, respondent no. one (builder) filed a civil suit for defamation and a declaration to the effect that the agreement for sale had been validly terminated, inter alia,” the plea claimed, adding, “this was done in order to threaten the petitioner (Malik) and silence his voice against the illegal actions of respondent no. one (builder)”.

  1. Shirish Shanbhag
    Sep 19, 2017 at 10:23 am
    Good judgement by supreme court in harressment by unscrupulous builder.
    Reply
    1. Shirish Shanbhag
      Sep 19, 2017 at 10:21 am
      How complainant has not been heard at Thane court, when things are apparent, that Builder has cheated the flat buyer. By accepting defamation suit, Thane court has set a wrong precedent to court.
      Reply

      Go to Top