Amid growing chorus to build Ram temple at Ayodhya by bypassing the Supreme Court and bringing in an ordinance, a Muslim litigant in the matter, Iqbal Ansari, on Tuesday said he had no problem if this was done. Talking to local media in Ayodhya, Ansari said if the Union government brought an ordinance for a Ram temple, he would not oppose it. "If the country would be happy in doing so, I am for it," he said. "Agar isse mulk mein aman our khushhaali aayegi to main iske liye tayyar noon" (if this brings peace and prosperity in the country, so be it, am ready), he said. Iqbal Ansari's father Hashim Ansari was the lone litigant in the matter and despite contesting the case for decades, he often spoke of an amicable settlement of the contentious issue. Also Read: VHP to hold public rallies for legislation on Ram Mandir in Ayodhya Ansari was associated with the Ayodhya title suit since 1961 when he, along with six others, was named the main plaintiff in the lawsuit Sunni Central Waqf Board filed in the court of Faizabad civil judge. Hashim Ansari, the lone surviving original litigant in the case, died in 2016 at the age of 96. Iqbal Ansari pointed out that he was doing so as he was a law-abiding citizen of the country. "We want good of this country and if ordinance route is the way, I support the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)," Ansari said. We have no objection if an ordinance is brought for the construction of Ram Mandir. If bringing an ordinance will be good for the country, bring it. We are law abiding citizens, we\u2019ll obey every law: Iqbal Ansari, Litigant in Ayodhya case pic.twitter.com\/yKeYetOT9R \u2014 ANI UP (@ANINewsUP) November 20, 2018 He, however, voiced his concern over the gathering of activists belonging to the Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP), Shiv Sena and other organisations in the temple town ahead of the November 25 'dharma Sabha.' He said he had apprised the district administration of his viewpoint. Sometime back, Ansari had aired his apprehensions at the congregation and said the build-up was like what it was prior to the demolition of Babri mosque in 1992. He had also threatened to migrate from Ayodhya due to "fear and feeling of insecurity". Uttar Pradesh DGP, OP Singh had however allayed his fears and said police would protect all citizens of the state. Security cover has since been given to the litigant.