Which is why it is so frustrating to see how the government got it so wrong on prices of natural gas. After all, as prime minister Narendra Modi understands when he speaks of the need for natural gas grids, even if you import gas at $11-12 per mmBtu, the price of piped cooking gas is still 50-60% cheaper than that of non-subsidised LPG. That is, at least in cities, the government could have built up natural gas pipelines and offered citizens gas at just slightly higher than what they pay for LPG today and had no subsidy burden. And if it had increased prices of local gas prices to the $8-9 recommended by the Rangarajan committee, once local supplies had commenced, the price citizens paid for piped cooking gas would have been the same as that paid for highly subsidised LPGanyone who has piped cooking gas from Indraprastha Gas in New Delhi and Mahanagar Gas in Mumbai can vouch for this.
Over the next few weeks, readers will hear lots of triumphant talk of how the government saved citizens from the UPAs marauding policies by ensuring the upward revision in gas prices will be approximately 75% less as compared to the price arrived at using Rangarajan formula and that approximately 80% of the additional revenue due to revision in gas price will go to the Government companies. That this was done by removing the Japanese LNG import component from Rangarajanbright TV anchors will talk about how this was right considering Japan does not produce natural gas. Others will talk of how the Russian gas price is to be taken in place of the National Balancing Point price for the Russian consumption considered under Former Soviet Union (FSU) countries.
Much of this is mumbo jumbo. As this column proved with data, excluding the Japanese price lowered the $8.3 per mmBtu price under Rangarajan by just $0.3 (The gas about gas, goo.gl/C0mpu8), nowhere near the 75% reduction-in-the-increase number being talked of today. That was done by simply putting in random numbers to arrive at a pre-determined number in much the same way a maths problem can be solvedby dividing, subtracting, multiplying and dividingas long as you know the answer. What is the point of looking at prices in consuming areasand that is all the NDAs formula has doneif this is not going to take into account, as the government press release itself states, the transportation and treatment charges
There are two things readers need to watch over the next few months, and yes, lets forget about Reliance Industries for a while, unless of course your name is either Prashant Bhushan or Arvind Kejriwal who spooked even Narendra Mod so much so that he couldnt do the right thing on natural
Watch out for whether the state-owned ONGC decides to commence production at any of its deep-water/ultra-deepwater fields like the Mahanadi one where ONGC wanted a price of $12-13 to be viable. Chances are it will not. Two, since the state-owned GAIL is just in the process of signing up for its third shipment from the US where prices of natural gas are around $3 per mmBtu, will GAIL supply this to consumers less the transportation and treatment charges. It wont, and thats why the pricing exercise isnt worth the paper it is printed upon. GAILs gas will not be available to Indian customers at under $10-11 per mmBtu.
But, various spokespersons will tell you, there is a provision to hike natural gas prices for ONGC and RIL-types who have discoveries in deep water areas. For all discoveries after this decision, in Ultra Deep Water Areas, Deep Water Areas and High Pressure-High Temperature areas, a premium would be given on the gas price to be determined as per the prescribed procedure, the press release states.
What is this prescribed procedure Its not clear but petroleum minister Dharmendra Pradhan told FE that, in the case of gas fields that are not remunerative at the $5.61 price, the matter will be escalated to finance minister Arun Jaitleys level.
Given Jaitleys well-known pragmatism and attention to detail, the implicit assumption is that the ONGCs and RILs will get their higher prices and all will be well with the world. The evil UPAs gas hike will be kept to the minimum to ensure consumers arent hurt, but companies will not be impacted since Jaitley will keep in mind their higher costs. Given that theres only so many ways you can break an egg, thats obviously so much hypocrisy. For one, consumers are equally badly hit when there is no gas and gas-based power plants dont runindeed, under the PPAs signed, even if these gas-based power plants dont run, consumers have to pay for their capital coststhis runs into several thousand crore rupees each year. Two, whether you pay higher prices for local gas or for imported gas, the net impact is the same; indeed it is higher for imported gas.
What is more worrying, from an investor point of view, is the levels of government discretion once again getting built into the system. The refusal to free up gas pricingsurely a 3-4 year roadmap could have been drawn up like the UPA did for dieselhas meant all discretion lies with the petroleum and finance ministries. The refusal to remove Pranab Mukherjees retrospective tax means a committee is to have the discretion over whether the taxman is going to abuse this powerby the way, in both the Vodafone and Shell capital infusion cases, the taxman used a retrospective tax amendment. In the case of defence FDI where the government buckled under pressure of domestic biggies and kept FDI to under 51%, the FIPB will have the discretion to allow higher FDI. Apart from worrying investors who are looking for more transparent rules, all that discretion is going to be fodder for several future CAG reports which will look at the undue benefit to ONGC/RIL by allowing gas pricing at $8.7 against the formula price of $5.6 were the costs of the deep sea blocks overstated You get the drift.