1. Narendra Modi govt unveils its first trade policy, targets doubling of exports at $900 bn

Narendra Modi govt unveils its first trade policy, targets doubling of exports at $900 bn

Aiming to nearly double India's exports of goods and services to US dollar 900 billion by 2020, the government announced several incentives...

By: | New Delhi | Updated: April 1, 2015 8:19 PM
Narendra Modi, Narendra Modi govt, Narendra Modi govt trade, Narendra Modi govt trade policy, Narendra Modi govt exports, Narendra Modi govt exports target, Nirmala Sitharaman, Nirmala Sitharaman india export, Nirmala Sitharaman trade policy, goods and services export, goods and services export india, india export, goods and services export india 2020, india export 2020, india trade policy, india current trade policy, FTP, india ftp, foreign trade policy, india news

Narendra Modi government aims to increase India’s exports of merchandise and services from US dollar 465.9 billion in 2013-14 to approximately US dollar 900 billion by 2019-20. (AP)

Aiming to nearly double India’s exports of goods and services to $900 billion by 2020, Narendra Modi government announced several incentives in the five-year Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) for exporters and units in the Special Economic Zones.

Unveiling the first trade policy of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government, Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said the FTP (2015-20) will introduce Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) and Services Exports from India Scheme (SEIS) to boost outward shipments.

Besides, higher level of incentives will be provided for export of agriculture products under the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), which seeks to integrate with Make In India and Digital India initiatives of the government.

“FTP lays down a roadmap for India’s global trade engagement in the coming years…India (will become) a significant participant in world trade by 2020,” Sitharaman said.

“The government aims to increase India’s exports of merchandise and services from USD 465.9 billion in 2013-14 to approximately USD 900 billion by 2019-20 and to raise India’s share in world exports from 2 percent to 3.5 per cent,” Commerce Secretary Rajeev Kher said.

The FTP also seeks to establish an Export Promotion Mission to provide an institutional framework to work with State Governments to boost India’s exports.

“Senior officials have been appointed as designated focal points for exports and imports in several Central Government departments,” said a release on the FTP.

Unlike the annual reviews of the past, the FTP will be reviewed after two-and-half years to ensure continuity in the trade policy.

Sitharaman said that export obligation would be reduced by 25 per cent and incentives available under the MEIS and SEIS would be extend to the units in the SEZs to make them more attractive for investors.

SEZs has lost their sheen after imposition of the minimum alternate tax (MAT) and dividend distribution tax (DDT) in 2012.

The duty credit scrips would be made freely transferable and usable for payment of customs duty, excise duty and service tax, she said, adding “debits against scrips would be eligible for CENVAT credit or drawback.”

Further business services, hotel and restaurants would get rewards scrips under SEIS at the rate of 3 per cent and other specified services at the rate of 5 per cent.

SEIS would be applied to ‘Service Providers located in India’ instead of ‘Indian Service Providers’. Served From India Scheme (SFIS) replaced with SEIS.

Under MEIS, the main sectors to be provided support includes processed, packaged agricultural and food items, agricultural and village industry goods.

“These schemes (MEIS and SEIS) replace multiple schemes earlier in place, each with different conditions for eligibility and usage. Benefits from both these schemes will be extended to units located in SEZs,” the minister added

The nomenclature for export houses is being changed to 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 star export house.

Highlights:

Following are the highlights of the Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 announced by Commerce & Industry Minister Nirmala Sitharaman today:

Increase exports to USD 900 billion by 2019-20, from USD 466 billion in 2013-14.

Raise India’s share in world exports from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent.

Merchandise Export from India Scheme (MEIS) and Service.

Exports from India Scheme (SEIS) launched.

Higher level of rewards under MEIS for export items with high domestic content and value addition.

Chapter-3 incentives extended to units located in SEZs.

Export obligation under EPCG scheme reduced to 75% to promote domestic capital goods manufacturing.

FTP to be aligned to Make in India, Digital India and Skills India initiatives.

Duty credit scrips made freely transferable and usable for payment of custom duty, excise duty and service tax.

Export promotion mission to take on board state governments.

Unlike annual reviews, FTP will be reviewed after two-and- half years.

Higher level of support for export of defence, farm produce and eco-friendly products.

FTP to promote eCommerce cos focusing on job creation

Under the new five-year Foreign Trade Policy (FTP), the government will provide incentives to eCommerce companies exporting products from sectors that create jobs.

Presenting the policy, Commence and Industry Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said government will provide incentives to eCommerce firms that export products from sectors on which the government is focusing on job creation.

Under the new five-year Foreign Trade Policy (2015-20) the government has introduced two new schemes – Merchandise Exports from India Scheme (MEIS) and Services Exports from India Scheme (SEIS) to promote exports.

Firms that export goods through courier or foreign post office using e-commerce of FOB (Freight on Board) value up to Rs 25,000 per consignment will be entitled for rewards under MEIS.

The objective of MEIS is to offset infra inefficiencies and associated costs involved in export of goods, which are manufactured in India and especially those having high export intensity, employment potential and can enhance India’s export competitiveness.

If the value of exports using e-commerce platform is more than Rs 25,000 per consignment then MEIS reward would be limited to FOB value of Rs 25,000 only.

The goods entitled for benefit under the scheme are handloom, books & periodicals, leather footwear, toys and customised fashion garments.

“Export of such goods under courier regulations shall be allowed manually on pilot basis through airports at New Delhi, Mumbai and Chennai…Department of Revenue shall fast track the implementation of EDI mode at courier terminals,” the policy said.

FTP proposes new institutions to boost global trade

The new Foreign Trade Policy unveiled today proposed setting up of a host of institutions, including Trade Council and National Committee on Trade Facilitation, to improve India’s share in global trade and implement of WTO obligations.

The country aims at increasing its share in world exports from 2 per cent to 3.5 per cent by 2020.

Pursuant to the WTO agreement on trade facilitation, the policy has proposed setting up National Committee on Trade Facilitation. That pact is aimed at easing customs procedure to reduce transactions cost for traders.

The policy said several initiatives are under way for the simplification of procedures and digitization of various processes involved in trade transactions.

Steps are being taken by various ministries and departments to simplify administrative procedures and reduce transaction costs based on the recommendations of two task forces constituted by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade.

The implementation of these recommendations is being actively pursued, the policy said.

Commerce Secretary Rajeev Kher said that India is committed to implement the WTO’s Trade Facilitation Agreement (TFA).

A National Committee on Trade Facilitation is being constituted for domestic coordination and implementation of the TFA, he said.

The Secretary also said an important consideration while framing the policy was aligning FTP with both India’s interests as well its obligations and commitments under various WTO agreements has

In the ongoing Doha Round of trade negotiations, he said, India will continue to work towards fulfilling its objectives and to work with like-minded members to remove any asymmetries in the multilateral trade rules which place a developing country at a disadvantage, such as the rules relating to public stock-holding for food security purposes.

“The current WTO rules as well as those under negotiation envisage the eventual phasing out of export subsidies. This is a pointer to the direction that export promotion efforts will have to take in future, i.e. towards more fundamental systemic measures rather than incentives and subsidies alone,” he said.

He also said that specific measures will be taken to facilitate the entry of new entrepreneurs and manufacturers in global trade through extensive training programmes.

“The Niryat Bandhu scheme will be revamped to achieve these objectives and also further dovetailed with the ongoing outreach programmes,” Kher said, adding capacity development efforts will focus on export promotion councils and commercial missions.

Further, a new institution – Centre for Research in International Trade – is being established not only to strengthen India’s research capabilities in the area of international trade, but also to enable developing countries to articulate their views and concerns from a well-informed position of strength.

The policy also said that two institutional mechanisms are being put in place for regular communication with stakeholders – the Board of Trade and the Council for Trade Development (CTD) and Promotion.

While the Board of Trade will have an advisory role, the CTD would have representation from State and UT governments.

“The CTD will be an institution between the Centre and the states with the objective of internalising the thinking and the processes and the participation of state government into central government policy making, implementation and monitoring,” Kher said.

‘India needs to gear up to face challenges of mega trade pacts’

Expressing concerns over two mega free trade agreements TPP and TTIP, the government today said the Indian industry needs to gear up to meet challenges that would emerge from these pacts.

While India is participating in the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement, it is not part of Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) and Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP).

Commerce Secretary Rajeev Kher said that these pacts would add a completely new dimension to the global trading system.

“The mega agreements are bound to challenge India’s industry in many ways, for instance, by eroding existing preferences for Indian products in established traditional markets such as the US and EU and establishing a more stringent and demanding framework of rules.

“Indian industry needs to gear up to meet these challenges for which the government will have to create an enabling environment,” Kher said.

He said India’s future bilateral and regional trade engagements will be with regions and countries that are not only promising markets, but also major suppliers of critical inputs and have complementarities with the Indian economy.

“The focus of India’s future trade relationship with its traditional markets in the developed world would be on exporting products with a higher value addition, supplying high quality inputs for the manufacturing sector in these markets and optimising applied customs duties on inputs for India’s manufacturing sector,” he added.

The TPP is a proposed trade agreement under negotiation among 12 countries — Australia, Brunei, Chile, Canada, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the US and Vietnam. TTIP is between the European Union and the US.

The 16-member RCEP comprises 10 Asean members and its six FTA partners namely India, China, Japan, Korea, Australia and New Zealand.

The Secretary said signing an FTA is just a beginning and not the end of the process as it would give benefit to traders.

“Recognising that it is important to review whether the concessions under these agreements are being gainfully utilised and have resulted in meaningful market access gains, an ‘Impact Analysis’ of FTAs has been instituted,” he said.

There is a need to simplify and ease rules of origin criteria to position India effectively in global and regional value chains.

“The likelihood of duty inversions will continue to be closely monitored to ensure that industry is not put to any disadvantage. A system for capturing preferential data will be put in place at the earliest,” he said.

Indian industry has raised concerns over these FTAs saying that it is benefiting more to the partner countries with which India has implemented such pacts.

The lack of information about India’s FTAs was also a common complaint flagged by industry. To address this, an intensive FTA outreach programme has been launched.

  1. David Smith
    Apr 3, 2015 at 12:23 am
    But, how many 'savvy' Americans (Indians) & their global corporate ociates are 'poised' to make windfall profits from their international cross investments & pre planned treaty 'arrangements' at the direct expense of the harmless non shareholders, ie. 95% - 99% of America (India), et al? *** While the good s folks of Wall St. may prefer to tell their 'Enron-able' customers that were also the victims of 'The Preliminary Foray of The Wall St. Meltdown', et al, that it's just some Unions that are fighting back, how much of the Fighting Back of Unions against the Secret, Unethical & Anti-Democratic Arrangements of The Global Treaties' 'Death-Star-Chamber' Tribunals, can be understood in the context of the harmless NON Shareholders, including Union members, fighting to Survive (not 'thrive') Against the Uncaring, 'Profits at Any (body else's) Costs', SHAREHOLDERS & their Colluding, Global Corporate Leaders? - Wall Street Journal, blog, Mar. 25, 2015 TPP & GLOBAL TREATIES; Gain a political 'Smidge', Lose ('Hidden' & Secret Costs) a Lot; The NET EFFECT. How many Years will Paying Tribunals' Penalties Bush Back tour Retirement Date? Global Corporate Economy Conniving to Get Harmless NON Shareholders to Pay Trillion$ in Court Costs, Punitive 'Penalties', etc.? No Treaties = Corporations/SHAREHOLDERS pay for Their Own 'Mistakes'. 'Fast Tracking', TPP corp. 'U.S.'s' Feeble Attempt to Avoid Court; SHAREHOLDERS & NON Shareholders Await Supreme Court's Findings to Proceed. How Many Preferred Shares of TPP, C-CIT, TTIP, CETA, et al, Generated Enterprises are You Selling your Right to Sue the Global Corporate Economy for? 'New' Shareholders Can Say 'NO' to & Over-Rule TPP, CETA, TTIP, et al, Plans? Will corp.'USA' et al, & Feds to Prepay $Billions for All 'Trade' Treaty/'Arrangements', et al, Secret ('Death-Star-Chamber) Tribunals' Punitive Damages to Protect Home State's Taxpayers? Other States, Munilities, et al, "...(we) need to control corp. USAs 'Contributions' “. Undemocratic, Higher Taxes & More Cuts to Services to Pay Secret Penalties; NON Shareholders Have to Pay corporates USA, Germany, France, an, Australia, Canada, et al, & their SHAREHOLDERS. But, If Not President PUTIN; 'The WHITE KNIGHT', then Who Do YOU Want to Bankroll the Saving of the harmless NON shareholders of the World from Fast Tracking TPP's, CETA's (TTIP) Secret 'Death-Star-Chamber' Tribunal Penalties? Will China, Iran, the Muslim World, et al, Support Putin in Suits? How about Warren Buffett, &/or, the 'coveted' Hong Kong investor, et al? It will be good for, not only the NON shareholders of the enterprises that can be generated by the on-going global 'cooperation' of corporate treaties, agreements, partnerships, et al, including the Trans Pacific Partnership, the EU - Canada CETA, TTIP, the China - Canada Investment Treaty, et al, but, for the potential shareholders, as well, who are quite interested to know if President Xi Jinping (China) will support Russia as a co-member of B.R.I.C.S. when President Putin uses his potential role as 'The White Knight'. And, while President Putin's potential support as 'The WHITE KNIGHT' in the development of the TPP, et al, litigation below can dramatically off-set the hundreds of billions of dollars due to the present & future sanctions leveled by American led, et al, corporations & financial insutions via their governments' signing their global corporate economic treaties/'arrangements', and the potential for making trillions of dollars for the Russian economy over the next 30 - 40 years & beyond, are the citizens (SHAREHOLDERS & NON shareholders) of Germany & AN just being prudent in wanting to wait for the outcome of: 1) The Submission to The SUPREME COURT of CANADA & the highest court in Germany, et al, to make their findings regarding 'The Submission': 'The SHAREHOLDERS & Corporations of AMERICA, CHINA, an, Germany, Canada, et al v the harmless Canadian NON shareholders, both; Native & non Native, et al'? (see; davidehsmith.wordpress) and 2) 'The MERKEL (Chancellor of Germany) Letter; To Sue, or, Be Sued?' ? (see; davidehsmith.wordpress) Have the federal representatives of the nations that are the potential signatories of TPP, TTIP, et al, willingly provided the NON shareholders of US, Canada, Europe, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, with the aforementioned information? Are the federal representatives, et al, depriving the NON shareholders of Canada, et al, of the due diligence information that enables the family of the NON shareholders of Canada, et al, to make informed decisions regarding their financial planning? And, would a reasonable person conclude by a preponderance of the evidence, &/or, beyond a reasonable doubt, that these doents, et al, demonstrate that the SHAREHOLDERS of AMERICA, CANADA , the EU & Trans Pacific nations, et al, really do not care which NON shareholders pay them the punitive penalties, etc., by way of their secret ('Death-Star Chamber') TRIBUNALS, as long as its not the SHAREHOLDERS who pay & not their corporations regardless of which country the corporations: 1) operating from, 2) maintain their headquarters, 3) use to do their cyber banking, accounting, 'taxation', etc. & 4) et al? And, re; the CHINA – Canada Investment Treaty (C-CIT), et al, is it understandable why the 'coveted' Hong Kong investor & his ociates are 'concerned' with the aforementioned findings of The SUPREME COURT of CANADA, et al, & the effects of the potential findings, et al, on the EU, AMERICA, the Trans Pacific nations, et al, treaties with CHINA, et al? In regard to arms s (and other 'contentious' products & services & investors, repatriating profits, et al) ; how about the of arms (non nuclear) in general in regard to the 'trade' treaties that are continuing to be secretly negotiated and how will the Tribunals, both; B.R.I.C.S. & non BRICS, adjudicate, decide & penalize the NON SHAREHOLDERS for the of legitimate, semi- legitimate & 'illegal' s of arms within the signatories nations & the those of others, &/or, unaligned? Of particular, interest is China, which does have an treaty with Canada, which puts China 'at odds' with other arms manufacturing & nuclear powers that it (China) does not have any 'arrangements' with. Are these types of questions that your politicians & the corporate lobbyists calls 'forget-me-nots' ('Buyer Beware') that will be (maybe) worked out after the fast tracked signatures are obtained? And, what do you think is the significance of the line in The Submission to The Supreme Court of Canada '...And, lest one forgets that the revelation of the present perilous international treaties/'arrangements' began with the regard for the rights of Native Canadians as per the Treaties/'arrangements' that corporate Canada & the Government of Canada have 'foisted' upon Native Canadians...'? What are the various ways that this line will cost the SHAREHOLDERS, et al? On the other hand, it may be worth repeating yet again, 'What the TREATY of VERSAILLES was to the 20th century PALES in COMPARISON to the TPP, CETA, C-CIT, NAFTA, et al, in the 21st'. And, how will YOUR submission to YOUR highest court IMPROVE upon The Submission that is presently before The Supreme Court of Canada? David E.H. Smith - Researcher - 'Qui tam...' ****** Also see; 'SECRET TPPartnership, CETA & C-CIT TRIBUNALS are INSIDER TRADING... ' at davidehsmith.wordpress ****** Please consider sharing the enclosed information & questions with 10 members of your family, friends, ociates in order that they can use the due diligence info to make more informed decision about their families' financial planning, & then they can share it with 10 others... ****** For more Information & Questions re; The Relationship between Human (Nature) Rights & Economics by way of the C-CI Treaty, the CET Agreement, TPP, et al, and The WAD Accord & List of RECENT ARTICLES, LETTERS & NOTIFICATIONS by DEHS, see; davidehsmith.wordpress
    Reply
    1. M
      Mangoman
      Apr 1, 2015 at 10:56 pm
      @Mohan Mohan (or other cabals/motha-ers) That's a profound question!! I'm sure no Hindu in India thought about it!!
      Reply
      1. P
        Pankaj#1
        Apr 2, 2015 at 2:29 am
        Great.
        Reply
        1. Mohan Mohan
          Apr 1, 2015 at 8:24 pm
          What if Cristian / Islamic Countries ban imports from Hindu India ?
          Reply
          1. @
            @Sunshine_india7
            Apr 2, 2015 at 8:42 am
            For everybody's information, there are "NO CHRISTIAN Countries" in this World. Brother, you seem to be one of those muludes of Indians who think, every country that has ENGLISH LANGUAGE as the official/primary language or are of the Western Europe/Americas t are Christian Nations. For your information, THEY are anything but CHRISTIAN.
            Reply
            1. Load More Comments

            Go to Top