CACP trashes food Bill, says farm sector to be hit

Comments print
fe Bureau: New Delhi, Dec 22 2012, 00:49 IST
Food.jpg
Even as the government readies to come out with a Food Security Bill (FSB) by the next Budget, the head of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) has come out with a striking critique of the programme.

The jointly authored study is hosted on the CACP’s website while saying the views are those of the authors and not necessarily of the organisations they work for.

Apart from saying the FSB will likely cost double the R95,000-120,000 crore the government estimates it will cost each year, CACP chief Ashok Gulati and his co-authors point to other major lacunae in the Bill. At the outset, they wonder why, when the government is working on Aadhaar-based cash transfers to take care of the problem of huge leakages in most government programmes — they estimate leakages under the targetted PDS at over 40% — it should be looking at expanding the existing PDS in such a massive manner.

While FCI is already groaning under the burden of the current levels of procurement — around 50-55 million tonnes annually — and doesn’t have the space to store the grain, the FSB will require FCI to procure around 25-30% more. Right now, while FCI has around 80 mt of grain, it only has covered or pucca storage facilities for 45 mt; another 17 mt is kept under tarpaulin on raised blocks (“covered and plinth” storage, in jargon), leaving the rest in the fields in the open. In other words, even before the issue of leakages in

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | 3 | Next
Previous Story  Quick view Next Story  Dec 2012, the kindest month for equity issues
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Fe Comment

B. Yerram Raju | 24-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
The authors served a good cause in exposing the perverse act of the Government in the name of Food Security. The recent calamity of NEELAM in intense paddy-growing districts of Andhra Pradesh illustrates how insurance mechanism fails the farmer in situations of natural calamity and the affected farmers had to beeline to the Government to shell out compensations for the loss and discoloured paddy to be procured by the Government agencies. Further, the Governments and the CACP should declare the minimum price only for paddy and not rice,when alone the stranglehold of rice-millers on the government can be eliminated and the farmers and not the millers who would get the benefit of the minimum price.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below