By Srinath Sridharan
The rise of United Payments Interface (UPI) is among India’s proudest digital triumphs. However, true strength in any infrastructure is measured not by its soaring growth curves, but by how it responds when cracks begin to show. In the wake of this year’s UPI outages, a consequential recalibration has begun, revealing how India’s most celebrated digital public goods weigh systemic resilience against genuine consumer protection. Faced with unexpected surges in transactions and conspicuous downtimes, the National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) moved swiftly to announce measures that, at first glance, seem practical and prudent.
Technical fixes, real-world consequences
Daily caps on balance enquiries and account list application programming interfaces, tighter limits on autopay retries, and rules steering recurring debits away from peak hours—all were framed as tough-love regulations to protect a backbone that handles over Rs 24 lakh crore each month. However, millions of consumers and small merchants will bear the brunt as they will be forced to rewrite operational routines around what the system can actually sustain.
The irony is striking. UPI Autopay accounts for barely 0.95% of monthly traffic, with around 175 million renewals out of 18.4 billion transactions. Even the most optimistic load relief from these throttles is symbolic. Yet even a modest 5% disruption carries a heavy toll—over Rs 9,600 crore in lost annual sales, nearly Rs 1,700 crore in tax shortfall, and quieter blows to households whose systematic investment plan (SIP) instalments bounce or children’s fees miss deadlines.
Small merchants and micro, small, and medium enterprises, especially in semi-urban India, have spent years building recurring payment flows, training teams, and investing in billing tools. Nearly 73% report income or efficiency gains from going digital, with UPI as the rail of choice for 48%. Yet, only 18% use digital lending, and seamless autopay success is vital to building the credit histories regulators want to see. Now, these businesses must re-engineer systems, rethink customer communication, and navigate unclear rules on which transactions may fail and when. What is framed as technical necessity becomes, in practice, a quiet transfer of burden from regulator and platform to merchant and consumer, widening the digital divide the policy claims to close.
Ripple effects across sectors
Beyond them lie larger stakes. Annual recurring revenues exceed Rs 1.93 lakh crore across digital content, edtech, and software as a service. Even small disruptions ripple through tax collections, business growth, and household planning. A single missed Rs 2,000 SIP instalment can shrink a corpus by Rs 72,000 over 20 years, and scaled across 1% of accounts, could erase Rs 4,900 crore in household wealth each month.
Bharat BillPay processed 246 million bills worth Rs 1.1 lakh crore in January alone. Missed autopay renewals could push lakhs back to counters just to keep the power on. Meanwhile, 7.49 crore Atal Pension Yojana subscribers risk penalties and account freezes from failed debits, and over 23 crore low-income Indians could lose a Rs 2-lakh life cover if a Rs 436 auto-premium fails.
The creator economy too stands exposed. Already influencing $350 billion in annual consumer spend and projected to surpass $1 trillion by 2030, it relies on millions of sub-Rs 500 autopay microtransactions. Even low failure rates can wipe out crores in monthly income and slow a sector set to add billions in GDP-linked demand.
In essential services, a single large online grocer brand fulfils nearly five lakh orders a day, while quick commerce platforms employ lakhs of gig workers and dark-store staff. Even short freezes in renewals can idle these workers and disrupt what millions see as daily infrastructure. Beyond India’s borders, blunt throttles risk signalling that scale is still managed through caps rather than design, undermining UPI’s ambition to expand to 20 countries by 2027.
Payment companies too have chosen the path of least resistance. It may feel safer to avoid appearing adversarial before regulators than to challenge rules that quietly transfer the burden onto those at the very end of the chain. What could have been a joint push for intelligent retries and clearer failure codes became a quiet exercise in passing the parcel.
There is real pain in being the last stop in a value chain where every player points elsewhere. It is the frustration of watching banks, platforms, and policymakers each deflect blame, while the burden rolls downhill and lands squarely on the consumer.
And so, we arrive at the real question. Who will blink first? UPI’s very architecture rests on two pillars—the Reserve Bank of India in Mumbai as the regulator, setting policy and safeguarding consumer interest; and the NPCI as operator and steward of the rail, issuing the circulars and throttles that decide who must adapt and how fast. Will they invest in real system-level resilience instead of governing by circulars? Will the NPCI look beyond technical caps to deepen reform? Will policymakers in Delhi insist that consumer protection or financial literacy become more than an annual slogan? Will payment companies stop quietly shifting the pain downstream and talk to regulators?
True resilience will come only when regulators, operators, platforms, and merchants build systems so reliable that consumers never see them. Ultimately, it is trust, not transaction volumes, that sustains UPI—and that will not endure if ordinary Indians remain the silent shock absorbers each time the system stumbles.
The writer is policy researcher and corporate adviser.
Disclaimer: Views expressed are personal and do not reflect the official position or policy of FinancialExpress.com. Reproducing this content without permission is prohibited.