The debate over Bengaluru’s infrastructure took a new turn this week after Kiran Mazumdar-Shaw, Biocon’s chairperson, slammed the government and city administration for “shoddy work,” pointing to potholes and garbage problems that drew the attention of a visiting Chinese guest.
Mansoor Khan, former Karnataka minister, responded on X, welcoming constructive criticism but questioning why Shaw’s outrage seemed focused only on Karnataka. He noted that when similar issues arise in Maharashtra or other BJP-ruled states, the blame is usually shifted to contractors. Khan also highlighted broader concerns, including unfair GST policies and funding delays for Bengaluru’s metro by the central government, arguing that selective concern weakened the credibility of her criticism.
‘We just had a big GST reform, so what’s unfair? ‘ asks Mohandas Pai
This drew a swift reply from Mohandas Pai, former Infosys director, who challenged Khan’s claim about “unfair GST policies.” Pai pointed out that GST decisions are made jointly by the Centre and all states, including Karnataka, and recent reforms were significant. He also noted that the Finance Commission, not any Delhi government, recommends fund devolution. He added that Karnataka “got a raw deal” under both the 14th and 15th Finance Commissions and urged Khan to stick to facts instead of spreading propaganda.
“What is the unfair GST policy? It is decided by all states and Centre together and Karnataka is part of the decision. We just had a big reform. So what’s unfair? Please explain? The FC under constitution recommends devolution of Funds. Not any govt in Delhi. Karnataka got a raw deal under 14/15 FC. 14 FC appointed by UPA, 15 FC by NDA. So are you blaming UPA headed by Dr Singh too? Please stop this propaganda and look at facts,” Pai’s post read.
The disagreement has erupted following the row over Bengaluru’s civic issues, which have been under the spotlight in recent months. Mazumdar-Shaw, who has been vocal about the city’s garbage and potholes, defended herself against Congress criticism that she only highlights problems in Karnataka while ignoring similar issues elsewhere. She said her concerns are natural as she lives in Bengaluru and has a vested interest in the city’s wellbeing.
The exchange between Khan, Pai, and Shaw adds another layer to the long-running debate over Bengaluru’s urban management, funding gaps, and state-Centre responsibilities.