FE Editorial : Driving an economy

Comments print
The Financial Express:  Dec 29 2012, 02:58 IST
Haryana’s loss could be Gujarat’s gain

Back in the early 1980s, when Japanese two-wheeler major Suzuki first came to India as a junior partner in a passenger car venture with the government of India, Haryana was seen as one of the more progressive states in the country. Over the years, as Maruti Udyog Limited began to indigenise production, a series of Suzuki’s Japanese vendors set up shop in Haryana as joint ventures with local partners—they produced electrical harnesses, steering systems, shock absorbers ... As Suzuki’s Japanese-style manufacturing practices began taking root, Japanese management and quality practices also got popular. Over the last decade, more than half the world’s Deming awards (the Oscars for quality systems) have been won by Indian firms. Cashing in on this Haryana quality boom, Maruti’s expansions were all planned in the state and after Suzuki took control over Maruti, it announced a new plant in the state along with a state-of-art R&D centre complete with a test track.

Over a period of time, however, with reports of labour unrest in the state, some of its allure vanished. While some majors like Hyundai chose to locate at Chennai, others set up base in Maharashtra. In October last year, Suzuki set the cat among the pigeons when it announced the setting up of a one million car facility in Gujarat, a state to which some months before this, Ratan Tata had said he was shifting his Nano project to. With this, the number of automobile firms who had announced Gujarat

... contd.

Ads by Google
   1 | 2 | Next
Previous Story  FE Editorial : More wheat mountains Next Story  Central, state govts not allowed to run TV channels: TRAI
Reader's Comments (1)| Post a Comment

Fe Comment

venkataramanaiah ramu | 30-Dec-2012Reply | Forward
It is true that Haryana's loss is Gujarat's gain.In the process, the ancilaries around the maruti's in Haryana are also the losers and the job prospects of so many are also killed.It would have been good for the co., also to put up the new plant alongside the existing one in view of he econmics and cost advantages, logistics,man power advantages etc.,Probably Haryana was not so keen on any of these as otherwise they could have ensured the plants expansion there itself.From the end users angle also, the erection of the new unit in Haryana would have proved the car price to be lower due to the already available infra.Of course, for car buyers these economies are probably of less importance.

Post your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *
Email *
Message *
 
captcha
please enter the above characters in the box below