The US House of Representatives passed the Laken Riley Act on Wednesday, mandating the detention of unauthorised immigrants accused of theft or violent crimes. This legislation marks a significant step aligning with former President Donald Trump‘s immigration crackdown policy. Named after a Georgia nursing student who was murdered by a Venezuelan man, the bill signifies a major shift in immigration policy following Trump’s election. The act passed with bipartisan support, garnering 263-156 votes, including 46 votes from Democrats.
Key Provisions of the Bill
The legislation directs US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to detain migrants charged with crimes such as shoplifting or assaulting a police officer. Additionally, it empowers state attorneys general to sue the federal government for damages resulting from immigration decisions. However, critics argue that the bill lacks the necessary funding for effective enforcement. The Department of Homeland Security estimates the implementation cost at $26.9 billion, which includes the expansion of detention facilities.
Democrats have expressed concerns about potential due process violations, particularly for minors and recipients of Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA). They also contend that the bill disproportionately targets minor offences compared to violent crimes. Critics warn that the initiative could overburden ICE without addressing systemic issues in immigration policy.
Political and Financial Implications
The bill underscores the Republican-led Congress’s emphasis on immigration enforcement. Republican leaders are also working to secure funding for Trump’s border priorities, which are projected to cost approximately $100 billion through budget reconciliation. Trump has suggested utilizing military resources for mass deportations, a move that would require significant logistical support, including additional immigration judges and staff.
Supporters of the bill argue that it is a necessary measure to curb criminal activity by unauthorized immigrants. Conversely, opponents cite studies indicating that immigrants generally commit fewer crimes than US-born citizens.
(With inputs from AP)