Jolly LLB 3 Box Office Collection Day 5: As Akshay Kumar and Arshad Warsi make their comeback after nearly a decade, Jolly LLB 3 had a blockbuster weekend. With an opening day of Rs 12.5 crore, the courtroom drama collected Rs 41 crore on the weekend itself. But, saw a dip on the weekends. After Day 5, on Tuesday, Jolly LLB 3 box office collection numbers look hopeful for a long theatrical run.

As viewers praise Saurabh Shukla’s character, Judge Sunder Lal Tripathi, they cannot get enough of the film’s witty and satirical remarks. Despite the Monday dip of 73.81%, Jolly LLB 3 saw an organic boost on Tuesday after it collected Rs 6.5 crore. The overall collection, however, crossed the Rs 65.5 crore as the Akshay Kumar starrer awaits what the week brings.

Jolly LLB 3 Box Office Day 5: Falling occupancy

Bringing a Jolly mood to the big screen, the Akshay Kumar-Arshad Warsi courtroom clash did not receive an overwhelming response from the audience on Tuesday. With an overall occupancy of 21.12%, night shows dominated the Jolly LLB 3 hype. Delhi NCR viewers came in decent numbers, 31.75%, for the 1409 shows scheduled in the capital.

ALSO READ

However, only Mumbai, Pune, and Jaipur crossed 20% occupancy; Surat returned to single-digit numbers over the 5-day run. Bengaluru, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Chennai, and Chandigarh, too, neared the 20% mark.

The Subhash Kapoor directorial also stars Huma Qureshi and Amrita Rao in key roles and was produced by Star Studios. OTT star Gajraj Rao also features in Jolly LLB 3 for his character, Haribhai Khaitan.

Jolly LLB 3 reviews: What is the Internet saying?

Netizens were raving about the film being a classic family film and lauded Saurabh Shukla’s performance. While the appreciation was a constant feature, several viewers compared it to the other films in the franchise. “Jolly LLB 3 is good, But too many inconsistencies in the movie. Not better than Part 2 & Part 1 for sure. The subject is too good. Emotion tries to hit you. Comedy is a breath of fresh air. Outstanding comedy & that’s exactly what saved the movie. Drama lacks depth. Good. Not great,” read a review online.

Some audiences called it worth the money, while others criticised it for its “pre-1991 cinema” with a “weak storyline”. Some even felt that the sequel did not seem fresh but reins due to its strong performance and humour.