The Supreme Court on Wednesday reserved judgment on a batch of petitions seeking 100 per cent cross-verification of vote count in electronic voting machines (EVMS) with voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) paper slips.

The court said it is not the controlling authority for elections and cannot dictate the functioning of the Election Commission, a constitutional authority.

The court has reserved the judgment for now. The bench of Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Dipankar Datta said it cannot act on mere suspicion.

Earlier in the day, the court posed a set of queries to the Election Commission of India (ECI) on the functioning of EVMs and sought the presence of an ECI official in the court at 2 pm to answer them.

Also Read: “We all know what happened…” says SC as it calls for cross-verification with VVPAT slips

Responding to concerns raised by Advocate Prashant Bhushan, appearing for petitioner Association for Democratic Reforms, the court said, “If you are predisposed about a thought-process, then we cannot help you… we are not here to change your thought process.”

Amid apprehensions regarding EVMs, the petitions seek a direction to cross-verify every vote cast on EVMs with the paper slips generated by the VVPAT system. Currently, this cross-verification is done for five randomly selected EVMs in every Assembly constituency.

Also Read: Supreme Court reserves verdict on pleas seeking cross-verification of votes cast using EVMs with VVPAT

In the earlier hearings, the petitioners raised the issue of public trust and drew comparisons with European countries that have gone back to the ballot voting system. The court shot down such comparisons, observing that the challenges here are different. However, the Election Commission, on its part, stressed that the current system is foolproof.

Read Next