Trump Harris debate highlights: Democratic candidate Kamala Harris challenged her Republican rival, Donald Trump, on multiple fronts during the heated US presidential debate held on Tuesday. Harris, a former prosecutor, began the debate with a forceful approach, targeting Trump’s suitability for office, his support for abortion restrictions, and his ongoing legal troubles. Her assertive performance visibly agitated Trump, who responded with a series of contentious and misleading statements. Let’s have a look:

Trump’s Controversial Claims

At one point, Harris provoked Trump by commenting on the early departures from his rallies, describing them as driven by “exhaustion and boredom.” Trump, defending his rally sizes, claimed they were the largest in political history. He then made a baseless claim about immigrants in Springfield, Ohio, allegedly eating pets, a statement amplified by his vice presidential pick, JD Vance. Harris criticized this claim as extreme and indicative of Trump’s strategy to generate viral moments.

Harris vs Trump: Debate Dynamics and Key Issues

With just eight weeks remaining before the election and early voting soon to start, this debate provided a critical platform for both candidates to make their case to millions of viewers. While the debate covered immigration, foreign policy, and healthcare, it lacked specific policy details. Wall Street observed the debate closely, though it did not provide clear insights into future policy directions. Harris’ vigorous approach succeeded in shifting focus onto Trump, with her supporters feeling buoyed and some Republicans recognizing Trump’s difficulties.

Focus on Abortion and Project 2025

Harris delivered a passionate critique of abortion restrictions, emphasizing the impact on women facing emergency situations and the need for reproductive rights protections. Trump, on the other hand, inaccurately accused Harris and Democrats of supporting infanticide, a claim debunked by the moderator. Harris also sought to link Trump to Project 2025, a conservative policy agenda, though Trump denied any direct involvement.

Economic and Foreign Policy Disputes

The debate began with a focus on economic issues, where Harris criticized Trump’s proposed tariffs and promoted her own tax benefits plan. Trump, in turn, attacked Harris for the current inflation rates, exaggerating the economic impact. The candidates also debated the Israel-Gaza conflict and the Russian invasion of Ukraine, but offered no detailed solutions for resolving these crises.

Trump’s Debate Performance

Trump, who had previously engaged in personal attacks against Harris, avoided such remarks during the initial part of the debate but became visibly frustrated as Harris pressed on. Trump responded to a moderator’s question about his racial comments by dismissing them and claiming he was indifferent to Harris’ racial identity. Harris countered by accusing Trump of attempting to use race to divide the nation.

Taylor Swift’s Endorsement boosts Harris

Following the debate, pop superstar Taylor Swift publicly endorsed Harris and her running mate, Tim Walz, on Instagram, bolstering Harris’ campaign. Swift’s endorsement, signed off with the playful moniker “childless cat lady,” drew attention to controversial comments made by Vance. As a result, Harris’ odds of winning improved in prediction markets, while Trump’s chances declined.

Will Harris win?

While presidential debates don’t always sway voter opinions significantly, they can have notable consequences. Harris’ performance might influence the tight race in battleground states. Polls show the candidates are closely matched, and even minor shifts in public opinion could be decisive in the upcoming election.

(With Reuters Inputs)

Read Next