Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg went to court to gain ownership of isolated pockets of land tucked away within his sprawling estate in Hawaii, many of which are less than an acre and could be split between hundreds of owners in a situation unique to the islands.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg went to court to gain ownership of isolated pockets of land tucked away within his sprawling estate in Hawaii, many of which are less than an acre and could be split between hundreds of owners in a situation unique to the islands.The 14 parcels on the north shore of Kauai initially belonged to Native Hawaiians who were awarded the land during the mid-19th century, when private property was established in the islands.
Many of the owners died without a will and courts never determined who inherited the land, according to court documents filed by Zuckerberg’s attorneys last month. The documents say hundreds could now own an interest in the small pieces of land, including many who are not aware they do. The lawsuits ask a court to find the owners and provide them fair compensation. Judges frequently order auctions in similar cases.
Zuckerberg wrote in a Facebook post Thursday that he filed the cases to find all the partial owners so he can pay them their fair share.
”For most of these folks, they will now receive money for something they never even knew they had. No one will be forced off the land,” he said.
You May Also Want To Watch:
University of Hawaii law professor David Callies guesses Zuckerberg is concerned about the rights any landlocked landowners would have to cross his property to get to the road or ocean. Courts almost always award an easement that allows landlocked owners to cross another property to get to public areas, he said.
He recalled that George Harrison of the Beatles discovered his Maui neighbors had an easement that passed within 15 feet of his front window. The neighbors had it so they could get to the ocean.
”The court is used to this notion of easements and wealthy famous people not wanting people on their land, especially near their house,” Callies said.
Zuckerberg’s court documents say previous owners of his 700-acre property controlled many of the pieces of land for decades when they were part of a ranch and a sugar plantation.
Carlos Andrade partly owns a nearby parcel, which his ancestor, a sugar cane plantation worker, bought in 1894, the Honolulu Star-Advertiser reported. The retired university professor, a Native Hawaiian, jointly filed a lawsuit with Zuckerberg to try to find other relatives with an interest in the property.
”I feel that each succeeding generation will become owners of smaller and smaller interests, each having less and less percentage of the lands and less and less capability to make sure everyone gets their fair share of (the ancestor’s) investment in the future of his family,” Andrade wrote in a letter to his family members.
The parcels emerged during land reforms by the Kingdom of Hawaii in the 1800s. Until that point, no one individually owned land – it was collectively cared for and used.
King Kamehameha III intended for property to be divided equally among the monarch, other royals and the commoners who fished and farmed the land. Only about 28,000 acres went to commoners. Millions of acres went to the king, government and royals.
Today, much of Hawaii’s land is controlled by large landowners and federal, state and local governments.
King Kamehameha IV sold the 3,000-acre ahupuaa, or traditional Hawaiian land division, where Zuckerberg’s property lies to an American businessman, Charles Titcomb, for $2,600 in 1863, according to the Kilauea Neighborhood Association website.
In 1877, Titcomb sold some of it to English Capt. John Ross and Edward Adams, who established Kilauea Sugar Co., The Garden Island newspaper reported. The sugar plantation operated until 1971.
In 1896, the company acquired interest in less than half an acre that Zuckerberg cites in a lawsuit. It had been awarded to a woman identified only as Oma in 1851 and passed to her son. The Facebook executive’s filing aims to find out whether any other descendants of Oma may have an interest in the property.
Many commoners awarded land left their properties when they went to cities for work. Large landowners would use ”adverse possession,” similar to squatting, to take control of the properties.