Subrata Roy’s Sahara group case: All you needed to know in 5 points

1/6

Subrata Roy's Sahara group case: Although it has businesses ranging from finance and property to media and Formula One motor racing, beleaguered Subrata Roy's Sahara group has never been very transparent on the source and use of the billions of dollars it has raised from mostly small investors. Suspicions have swirled for years that many of Sahara group's millions of investors are fictitious names. Sahara's founder Subrata Roy has spent the past 21 months in New Delhi's Tihar jail for failing to comply with the Supreme Court's order to pay back $5.4 bn to investors in the 2008-11 savings plan. Here is all you wanted to know about the Subrata Roy-led Sahara group case in 5 noteworthy points: (Text by Reuters; Express photo)

2/6

1. Subrata Roy's Sahara group case: Sahara group became a major financial institution, one of India's largest employers and owner of marquee overseas assets including New York's Plaza hotel on the back of tiny investments from farmers, street vendors and others, whose monthly income can be as low as Rs 2,000-3,000 ($30-$45) a month.

3/6

2. Subrata Roy's Sahara group case: A team of officials from the Enforcement Directorate, which is responsible for fighting economic crime, last month visited Sahara group headquarters in Lucknow to gather data as part of a probe into possible money laundering – money laundering refers to the practice of routing money into various assets outside the country, without revealing the source to avoid paying tax.

4/6

3. Subrata Roy's Sahara group case: Reacting to a query, one of the officials, who was part of the team said, "Since the data is huge we will take time to get the finer details." Both the officials declined to be named. The Enforcement Directorate declined to comment officially to Reuters. Sahara did not respond to Reuters request for comment.

5/6

4. Subrata Roy's Sahara group case: Sahara group has previously denied the money laundering allegations or that roughly 30 million investors in its 2008-11 financial plan – later ruled illegal by the markets regulator Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) – were fictitious. It sent a convoy of 127 trucks, purportedly filled with the documents of its investors in its 2008-11 bonds scheme, to SEBI two years ago in an effort to prove that.

6/6

5. Subrata Roy's Sahara group case: Supreme Court, which has ordered Sahara group to return $5.4 billion to investors who put money in the 2008-11 plan, in August 2012 questioned the authenticity of Sahara's investors in the 2008-11 plans and whether many of them were fictitious. Alluding to this suspicion, one of the judges of the Supreme Court had said: "Despite restraint, one is compelled to record, that the whole affair seems to be doubtful, dubious and questionable."