Private sector quotas start, MP sets the ball rolling

By: |
Published: November 8, 2019 12:58:19 AM

What is clear, though, is that this is the thin end of the wedge, and over time, other states could also start implementing such a policy.

Private sector quotas, government jobs, caste based reservations, private sector, MSME, EWS upper-castes, Maratha quota, Indra Sawhney judgmenWhat is clear, though, is that this is the thin end of the wedge, and over time, other states could also start implementing such a policy.

Given how government jobs are either declining or growing very slowly, a large number of politicians have been keen to introduce caste-based reservations in the private sector, both in education as well as in jobs. Fortunately, however, better sense has prevailed and, at least so far, there has been no reservation; in all probability, the fear was that the courts would strike it down as being unconstitutional since the government doesn’t fund the private sector. The first step towards such quotas, albeit a bit hesitant, however, appears to have been taken in Madhya Pradesh. Like many other states, Madhya Pradesh’s policy on MSMEs that avail of some government benefit, like low-cost land or some tax-holiday, requires that the bulk of jobs (in this case, 70%) be reserved for locals; whether this can actually be implemented, though, is a different question. In the case of Gujarat, despite having an 85% reservation for locals, there is a very large proportion of migrant workers in many industries.

What makes the Madhya Pradesh policy different, a report in The Indian Express points out, is that the MSMEs that get these benefits must also ensure that SC/ST/OBCs get representation; the policy does not mention any reservations for the EWS upper-castes, though. It is, however, not clear how stringently this provision will be implemented, and how much time local firms will get to implement it in full.

What is clear, though, is that this is the thin end of the wedge, and over time, other states could also start implementing such a policy. In the case of farm loan waivers, for instance, once prime minister Narendra Modi promised these in the run-up to the Uttar Pradesh assembly poll, it was followed by a rash of similar promises by other states. And, in the case of quotas, while a 50% ceiling that emanated from the Indra Sawhney judgment was taken to be the laxman rekha for decades, once states like Maharashtra came up with a Maratha quota, other states ended up following suit; Madhya Pradesh raised the OBC quota from 14% to 27% some months ago. Indeed, by introducing the 10% quota for economically weak upper castes, the central government, too, decided to ignore the cap prescribed by the Indra Sawhney judgment. Put another way, there is nothing to stop the spread of a bad idea. That is why, it is very important that this new law be challenged at the earliest since the boundaries of reservations are constantly being tested; sadly, the courts have not resisted this. Indeed, they have aided the spread of reservation—in the case of reservations in promotions or in higher education, for instance—on many occasions.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Next Stories
1RCEP pull-out: India right in sticking to its terms and conditions
2Modi’s decision to opt out of RCEP reflects India’s prudence on dairy trade
3Growth strategy: Can fiscal stimulus revive growth?