title-bar

India must act soon on plastics

Published: January 24, 2019 12:29:20 AM

Asia consumes 50% of global plastic packaging, which could quadruple by 2050. Food, beverage and healthcare represent 75% of plastic packaging use.

plastic, plastic waste, plastic waste in indiaIndia must act soon on plastics

By Sameer Chopra

Asia consumes 50% of global plastic packaging, which could quadruple by 2050. Food, beverage and healthcare represent 75% of plastic packaging use. New consumption patterns, including Asia’s rising appetite for e-commerce and food delivery (+84% y-o-y) add to demand for plastic packaging.

Recycling rates are low, with the exception of Japan (83%) and Taiwan (35%). Hence, unfortunately, the region contributes 82% of plastic waste which leaks into oceans with China, India and ASEAN contributing 2.7-7.3million tonnes pa. Recent media attention and political impetus (G10 initiative) will see plastic waste become a key focal point for government intervention.

Australia, Japan and Taiwan have targeted regulatory effort at manufacturers. China and Indonesia introduced surcharge for plastic bags. Mumbai recently set `5,000 fine for plastic bags and bottles. Korea looking to exit coloured plastic bottles by 2020 and Taiwan all plastic packaging by 2030.

Tackling plastic packaging will see re-tooling of the supply chain, with associated cost and capex. We examined disclosure from 41 companies in Asia exposed to plastic packaging—packagers/ petrochem (12), FMCG/Retail (22) and pharma/electronics (7). We see higher risk for “coloured flexibles”, e.g., and snack packets, over “rigids”, e.g., shampoos and beverage bottles.

Plastic represents 37% of packaging in Asia, worth $150 billion. Plastic consumes 6% of global oil and at current growth rates could account for 20% of oil consumption by 2050. Now, there are obvious benefits of using plastic: durability, safety, hygiene, and lightweight. However, 95% is designed for short-term (single) use and could take more than 500 years to biodegrade.

Since the early 1950s, more than 8.3 billion tonnes of plastic has been produced globally but only 9% of plastic waste ever produced has been recycled, 12% incinerated and 79% ended up in landfills, dumps or the natural environment.

Plastic waste dumping in the ocean is becoming an increasing environmental concern. By 2050, the amount of plastics in the ocean will equal to the total weight of fish in the ocean. The major rivers in Asia carry more than 90% of plastic waste in the ocean. The Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) estimates that the cost to tourism, fishing and shipping industries was $1.3billion in the region alone.

Majority of the plastic waste in Asia is “mismanaged”. Low economic value contributes to the circa 45% of Asia’s plastic waste which is mismanaged (i.e., dumped). Recycling rates are disclosed by some markets—Australia (14%), Japan (82%), Singapore (7%) and Taiwan (35%).

READ ALSO | Hiring to rise in next 6 months; IT, BFSI, BPO to generate maximum jobs, says survey

Few markets measure recycling rates
Reporting of plastic generation and recycling varies across the region. Countries that disclose clear metrics include Australia, Japan, Singapore and Taiwan.
Average waste collection rate across China, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam is just over 40%. This low vale could be because of—

Low economic value: 80% of plastic waste has low residual value such as plastic bags. In contrast, the collection rate for higher value PET bottles is 90%. George Staphos notes higher recycling for aluminium cans (55%) as sufficiently high selling prices relative to collection costs, make the economics attractive.

Poor separation at source: Kerbside collection in Asia Pacific often includes co-mingled plastics with paper, glass and aluminium. Majority of the sorting occurs manually. In contrast,the Lobbe facility in Germany sorts 18 tonnes of packaging per hour, including the ability to handle 20 mm flexibles packaging.

High rate of pigment contamination: Clear plastics have the highest value and are preferred in the recycling market. Dyed and pigmented plastics contain contaminants and are often disposed rather than recycled.

Cheaper to dump or export than to recycle: Absent subsidies from the government, it is often cheaper to export and dump plastic waste in landfill. China’s recent waste import ban may see the value of plastic scrap fall and encourage further investment in recycling initiatives.

Recent regulatory effort has focused on “no more free plastic bags”, extended producer responsibility and consumer waste levies. Australia, Japan and Taiwan have targeted regulatory effort at manufacturers.

In January 2018, China banned the import of plastic waste. Prior to the ban, China imported up to 56% of global exported plastic waste. The largest exporters of waste to China included the US, the UK, the EU and Japan. After China’s ban, we are likely to see more stringent plastic waste policies introduced across the globe and in Asia.

We have examined a subset of 41 companies in Asia with exposure to plastic packaging. There is growing acceptance of plastic reduction in these companies. Cut-back in quantity of material per package and use of recycled material demonstrate commitment to plastic waste reduction. Risks are higher for those exposed to “flexibles”.

Edited excerpts from BofAML’s ESG Matters-Asia report titled Asia’s plastic packaging diet: Trimming the “rigids” waste-line

The author is Research Analyst, Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Switch to Hindi Edition