India 2025: Towards a $5-trillion economy?

Published: January 28, 2020 1:19:49 AM

India’s growth will be driven by competitive federalism and increased competition between the states. A move towards increased expenditure flexibility in favour of the states presents an opportunity to align local development needs and priorities with the resources available.

The pessimistic outlook is that poor physical and human infrastructure will transform India’s demographic dividend into a disaster.

By Ejaz Ghani  

Will India become a $5-trillion economy in 2025? There are two contrasting outlooks: optimistic and pessimistic. Both views are grounded in reality. The optimistic view is that growth will be propelled higher by rise of the middle class, young demographics, and changes in globalisation. The pessimistic outlook is that poor physical and human infrastructure will transform India’s demographic dividend into a disaster.

The optimistic outlook

India will emerge with the largest middle class in the world by 2025, and much larger than in the US today. India has long been known as a country of poor people, with a handful of billionaires. This has changed dramatically due to the large bulge of the population that has emerged out of poverty. They are the ‘birds of gold’ that will propel growth. Growth, education, home ownership, and improved economic security are associated with an expanding middle class.

The pace at which the middle class will increase will be staggering, and has the potential to increase at a much faster rate compared to China. The median age in India is 28 years, compared 37 in China and the US, 49 in Japan, and 45 in Western Europe. The middle class will expand through several channels in India: swelling of the labour force as the baby boomers reach working age; divert resources from spending on children to investing in skills technological progress; increased women’s workforce that naturally accompanies a decline in fertility; working age also happens to be the prime years for savings, which is key to the accumulation of physical capital; and the boost to savings that occurs as the incentive to save for longer periods of retirement increases with greater longevity.

Thanks to young demographics, India is well positioned to benefit from a rising global talent race. More than 3% of all people live outside the country of their birth. But while the share of migrants in the world’s population has remained mostly stable for six decades, its composition has changed. The share of high-skilled migrants relative to low-skilled migrants has grown dramatically, owing to the globalisation of demand for talent. And this development has a clear geographic dimension. Nearly 75% of all high-skilled migrants reside in the US, the UK, Canada, and Australia; over 70% of software engineers in Silicon Valley are foreign-born, mostly India.

A worldwide ‘war for talent’ is being waged, and enterprises that manage their global talent pool well are marching ahead. Most multinational corporations now insist that high-potential executives gain global experience by working in other countries, and they have made international mobility a prerequisite for senior leadership positions. Some of the global economy’s most familiar players—including Google, Microsoft, Alcoa, Clorox, Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, Pepsi and Pfizer—have immigrant CEOs.

India will continue to benefit from a global talent race, thanks to declining transportation and communication costs (high-skilled migrants tend to travel farther to their destination countries than do less-skilled migrants), and the growing recognition that human capital will play a key role in today’s knowledge economy.

Can India sustain high growth rate to become a $5-trillion economy if global growth becomes fragile? It is not growth in the rich countries that will drive India’s growth, but the room for ‘catch up’ that will drive India’s fast pace. This ‘convergence gap’ between India and the US is wider now than it has been at any time since the 1970s. So the growth potential is correspondingly larger. This can be seen in India’s digitisation process, which is much faster compared to the US’s.

Unlike China, India is less exposed to rising global trade disputes. India has relied on twin engines of growth—export and domestic consumption. The resilience of India rests on the huge domestic market, as the share of household consumption in GDP in India is much higher than in China.

India has also trades differently. While China is the global centre for manufacturing, India has acquired a global reputation as a hub for services export. The pace at which trade in services will grow will outpace trade in goods, given higher global cost differential in the production of services, and the ease with which modern services can be transported through the internet.

Will a global financial crisis and capital volatility derail India’s growth? No. India has attracted remittances inflows than portfolio flows and bank loans. Remittance inflows are more stable and persistent than portfolio flows. The 2008 financial crisis showed that the ‘Washington Consensus’ was too complacent about changing market and macroeconomic conditions. A decade later, new concerns have emerged.

The pessimistic outlook

The 20th century has sent shocking waves of industrial destruction, with the shift of manufacturing base from developed to developing countries. The 21st century of cyber globalisation will not be immune to crack-ups and rising global trade disputes.

India is very dependent on the monsoon, given its importance to agriculture, and the country still remains largely a rural economy. Monsoons have been adversely impacted by a changing global environment that has already reached a tipping point of no recovery. India is the most water-scarce country in the world. More than 20 Indian cities would be adversely impacted by zero groundwater levels soon. It is unfortunate that cities and mayors have no say in policymaking.

A key challenge is to scale up investment in human and physical infrastructure to benefit from youth bulge and demographic dividend. India needs more fiscal federalism and less fiscal centralisation. States are not able to invest as they have a low base of economic activity to tax, and revenue constraints restrict investments needed to establish a level-playing field. Policymakers need to resolve coordination problems that are not easily or efficiently handled by administrative institutions, where institutions remain weak.

The challenges ahead

Both the optimistic and pessimistic outlooks are backed by equally strong arguments. Both views agree that growth is not automatic, and it should not be taken for granted. India’s demographic dividend and the rise of the middle class is a time-bound opportunity. In particular, it provides policymakers an incentive to redouble their efforts to tap into demographic dividend by improving physical infrastructure to promote entrepreneurship and job creation.

Pluralism in development is of great value today. India’s growth will be driven by competitive federalism and increased competition between the states. A move towards increased expenditure flexibility in favour of the states presents an opportunity to align local development needs and priorities with the resources available. The challenge is to find out what works best, in what context, and in what setting. This is not just about structural transformation, and a shift from agriculture to industry, but the ‘ownership of process’. Where India ends up in 2025 will depend a lot on what choices are provided today, and what actions are taken to reshape tomorrow.

The author is lead economist, World Bank. Views are personal

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Next Stories
1Isro’s humanoid means more for robotics development than for space exploration
2Draft genome-editing guidelines are restrictive
3Budget 2020: Being boring, and just implementing pre-existing policies is better