​​​
  1. From Satyam to PNB: Surely, the role of auditors needs to be probed here too?

From Satyam to PNB: Surely, the role of auditors needs to be probed here too?

While the government has asked RBI for a report on whether or not there were regulatory lapses, it seems clear the authorities have learnt little from the various scams over the years.

By: | Published: February 27, 2018 5:12 AM
Satyam, PNB, auditors, RBI, SWIFT Given the central bank’s failure to discover, in its multiple inspections over the years, that Punjab National Bank’s (PNB) SWIFT messaging system was not even linked to its core banking solutions, it is obvious RBI will bear the brunt of the blame for the Nirav Modi scam. (Reuters)

Given the central bank’s failure to discover, in its multiple inspections over the years, that Punjab National Bank’s (PNB) SWIFT messaging system was not even linked to its core banking solutions, it is obvious RBI will bear the brunt of the blame for the Nirav Modi scam. While the government has asked RBI for a report on whether or not there were regulatory lapses, it seems clear the authorities have learnt little from the various scams over the years. In the case of Satyam, for instance, Price Waterhouse was hauled up for its role as the auditor—the auditors have challenged Sebi’s auditing ban on them for two years. Oddly, there has been very little action so far on PNB’s auditors so far—certainly their role needs to be investigated and they have to explain what kind of audit they were doing if something as basic as linking SWIFT to core banking was not done. RBI also needs to look at whether PSU banks are selecting auditors on the L-1 basis without too much regard to the quality of their audits. Indeed, RBI needs to look at whether auditors, and not just at PNB, need to be blacklisted for not catching things in time, and ensure that the compulsory rotation—including that for firms who have got loans—is done diligently.

Getting bank officials to be on the board of firms who have taken loans seems a good idea since it is clear independent directors aren’t doing much to prevent fraud, but such directors are there on a few defaulter boards even today and that hasn’t really helped. It is, however, critical that, as a matter of routine, banks get detailed accounts of all associate companies of people/firms they make loans to and get good CAs or forensic CAs to do a regular check on fund flows—indeed, RBI’s order that no loans be made to associates at below the market rates also seems to be followed more in the breach.

Indeed, RBI should be paying for auditors/forensics of banks to avoid any conflict of interest, and surprise forensics from time to time is a good idea. While, in the pre-computerisation days, all cheques needed to be authorised by bank managers, it would appear bankers don’t study bank statements with any great degree of scrutiny anymore. And while there are firms who specialise in software to monitor fraud, it is not clear if these are being used—a large fraud detection/management exercise is critical for all PSU banks; the use of the same auditors in loans where frauds have taken place, for instance, should trigger alarms, as should loans to related parties or firms/trusts in which they are directors. Incentive structures, similarly, need to be revisited—if PSU bank managers are incentivised on making loans instead of their recovery, it is obvious where their attention will be, more so since their salaries are so poor.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

  1. Subrata Chakraborty
    Feb 27, 2018 at 10:39 pm
    When the Govt. is asking today from RBI, the regulator, whether there was any lapses on the part of the Regulator in monitoring functioning of PSBs, why the same Govt. did not attend Dr.Raghuram Rajan, while in office as RBI Governor, highlighting practice of 'crony capitalism', 'asset bubbles', 'suppression of frauds' incidents of PSBs ? The matter of total collapse of l Auditing system in PSBs and using Auditing to serve the purpose of vested circles only were also brought to the notices of all concerned and the same are lying with the offices of the Prime Minister and Finance Ministry as well but without any response as these offices mostly relied on the stand of the Bank management thus paving repeatation of 'Satyam' after 'Satyam' case to take place freely without any check.
    Reply

    Go to Top