The development of natural resources dates back to about 50,000 years—in the middle Paleolithic Chert mines of Nazlet Sabaha (or Safaha), a site on the western banks of the Nile River in Egypt. In India, zinc mining dates back to over 3,000 years in Rajasthan at Zawar.
The development of natural resources dates back to about 50,000 years—in the middle Paleolithic Chert mines of Nazlet Sabaha (or Safaha), a site on the western banks of the Nile River in Egypt. In India, zinc mining dates back to over 3,000 years in Rajasthan at Zawar. India produces 87 minerals which include 4 fuel minerals, 10 metallic minerals, 47 non-metallic minerals, 3 atomic minerals and 23 minor minerals. Mining was important in the ancient times, and mining is important today and for the future survival of mankind. Development of natural resources is essential for sustaining economies as it gives birth to industrial development, ancillary industries, employment generation and prosperity. Employment generation is a key result, but the end-result is eradication of poverty.
But, in the last decade and more, the contribution of the mining sector in GDP has been stagnant at nearly 1.2%, which is highly alarming. The Indian mining sector grew at a CAGR of 7.3% in the last decade compared to 22% in China in the same period. The mining sector in India employs a smaller percentage of India’s population, just about 0.3% as compared to 3.8% in South Africa, 1.4% in Chile and 0.7% in China. It is also true that employment in the Indian mining sector has grown at a rate of 3% per annum over the last 10 years.
A report from the McKinsey Global Institute suggests that development of the mining sector will be important if India has to achieve 7%-plus GDP growth. The report further says that the sector alone has the potential to create 6 million additional jobs by 2025. The sector can contribute an additional $125 billion to India’s output and $47 billion to India’s GDP by 2025.
About five years back, in the year 2012, the sector accounted for about 3 million direct jobs and additional 8 million indirectly. The mining sector contributed 3.4% of India’s GDP in 1992-93, which declined to 3% in 1999-2000 and further to 2.3% in 2009-10. To mention, every 1% increase in the growth rate of the sector results in a 1.2-1.4% increment in the growth rate of industrial production and, correspondingly, an increase of 0.3% in the growth rate of India’s GDP.
According to a report by Ficci, if India is looking to increase the share of the mining sector to 5% of the GDP in the next 20 years, this sector would be required to grow at the rate of 10-12% annually. The economies are simple. If India is unable to keep pace with the growing demand of infrastructure development, it would only be increasing the import bill. The import not only increases the cost but it also decreases the employment opportunities for the country. This becomes important since India currently has about 30% of its youth unemployed. The example of Angul in Odisha is unique. Due to the presence of the Mahanadi Coal Field, large down-stream industries have been set-up, and that has resulted in an increase in Angul’s GDP per capita, from Rs 39,000 to Rs 101,000. Even the lowest income group in Angul has decreased from 67% in 2002 to a mere 25% in 2012 and is expected to be less than 5% by 2025.
India is also far behind in expenditure towards exploration. It accounts for only 0.3%, compared with over 19% by Canada, 12% by Australia, 7% by United States, and 4.5% by China. The Geological Survey of India needs to expand its focus on baseline data generation to encourage exploration activities for the development of mining sector. Exploration in India is mostly limited to a depth of 50-100 metre as compared to 300 metres in countries such as Australia.
If India’s global ranking in production of minerals is an indication, it would not be wrong to say that economies of other countries are growing due to sustainable mining and have been successful in addressing unemployment and poverty issues. We, being a country of huge mineral reserves and resources, are lagging in mining growth because we are still struggling to implement even the existing policies. Self-declaration, simple policies and quick decisions are required to promote the mining sector. Policies of self-accountability with provision of stringent punishment will deter mining companies from doing any wrong.
In India, even for obtaining a mining lease, it takes minimum one-year’s time—and this can get extended to even more than 5 years—as compared to with just 30 days in Canada and 60 days in Australia. If the government wants to be a regulator and not the owner, then it should give a substantial space for industry to develop the mining sector. The fact is that we are already years behind, since mine-development itself takes about three-five years and setting up smelters for processing these minerals takes another two-three years; so, even if we start today, we would be able to achieve some results only by 2022.
To `Make in India’, we must `Mine in India’ and if we can do this, we would be able to address large unemployment issues. The strategic plan document from the ministry of mines has very impressively highlighted improvement in the functioning of GSI, IBM, R&D projects and human resource development as few of the key areas. The demand for minerals will grow four-five times over the next 12-15 years against a backdrop of globally decreasing resources. There would be a huge demand for the metals in view of rapid urbanisation and growth in the manufacturing sector.
The mining sector aspires to contribute 7-8% to India’s GDP and if this happens, India would realise a GDP of 9% in the coming years. This is expected to create at least 25 million jobs, directly and indirectly. But, above all, India will have an edge over other countries in terms of exports of these minerals, employment generation, eradication of poverty and taking a leadership position in the mining sector.