Covid lockdown: Help states beat budget constraints

By: |
Published: May 11, 2020 6:00 AM

Intro: States’ revenues, including central devolution, will contract; Centre must help them out or let RBI come up with a solution

As per the revised estimates (RE) for FY20, the tax devolution to states was Rs 6.5 lakh crore; this year, they might just about get Rs 4 lakh crore.

Given how states are staring at a liquidity crisis due to a collapse in revenues, both at the Centre and locally, they need to be given more fiscal room. To begin with, the share of revenues they receive from the Centre—the bulk of which is the GST—is falling as GST collections themselves are down to an estimated third of the usual in March; states get roughly 55% of the total collections. With direct tax collections too expected to be quite short of target given the economy is expected to contract this year, the devolutions are also likely to shrink. In a typical April, Kerala’s revenues are around Rs 8,000 crore; this time, they have been about a tenth of that. While devolution is happening, it is coming in driblets, and many states could soon run out of money.

As per the revised estimates (RE) for FY20, the tax devolution to states was Rs 6.5 lakh crore; this year, they might just about get Rs 4 lakh crore. Perhaps, the Centre should guarantee a minimum amount of devolution because, going by the current revenue flows, states are entitled to about 40% of the divisible pool.

As economist Govinda Rao points out, the budget estimates for revenues in FY21 are 6.5% smaller than those of the Finance Commission—which translates into a loss of some Rs 71,000 crore. There is a suggestion that the Centre should re-allocate the Rs 2 lakh crore of grants-in-aid for capital assets, provided for in the central budget, for immediate needs.

Unfortunately, the lockdown prevented states from mopping up revenues from auto fuels and alcohol, but even with the hikes, the revenues are not going to be sufficient to pay the bills. So, it is expenditure that is going to be axed. Already, salaries are being cut or deferred; as Kerala’s finance minister, Thomas Isaac, has said, there is simply no option. Punjab has managed May salaries, but is not so sure it can manage in June. Isaac has also pointed out that most development schemes would be deferred and, given that states account for 60% of total expenditure, this would hurt aggregate demand.

If the economy is not to be altogether derailed, there is a case for allowing states to borrow more by increasing the FRBM limit from 3% to 5%. To be sure, the higher borrowing limit must pencil in a flat or only slight growth in GSDP this year, but 2% additional room should be sufficient.

On a rough reckoning, for a reasonably good state—assuming revenues of 100 come down to 75, and the revenue expenditure stays the same at 110, with the capex down to zero—the fiscal deficit would go up to 3.5%. This number, of course, would be higher if the GSDP contracts.

That is the easy part. The real problem is that even though they have enough surpluses, banks are not keen to buy SDLs for fear of value erosion; at a recent auction, some states were made to cough up as much as 9%. To eliminate the mark-to market risks, some have suggested that the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) allow states to issue short-term paper, and permit banks to hold this till maturity. If this doesn’t comfort the banks, the Centre may need to borrow more and pass it on to the states.

As of now, states have baked in a 25%-30% increase in net SDLs in FY21, which would take total issuances to Rs 6.2-6.4 lakh crore from Rs 5 lakh crore in FY20. ICRA estimates gross issuances to rise by 19-23% to Rs 7.6-7.8 lakh crore in FY21, from Rs 6.3 lakh crore in FY20.

To help them tide over the immediate liquidity crisis, and to enable them to spend on health and emergency measures, states are hoping RBI will further raise the WMA—an overdraft facility. As of now, they are allowed 60% more than the March 31-level for H1FY21, or roughly `20,000 crore. Given that the onus of spending on healthcare and other essentials is almost entirely on the states, they are justifiably miffed that the Centre’s WMA has been upped to Rs 2 lakh crore from Rs 75,000 crore.

So far, states have been pruning their expenditure, primarily capex, and in some instances, salaries. Some are toying with the idea of deferring the allowances for 12-24 months. While an analysis by ICRA of 21 states shows their combined deficit to have narrowed to Rs 5.1 lakh crore in FY21 from Rs 5.6 lakh crore in FY20 RE, this looks highly unlikely now. But, given the exigencies, this is no time to quibble over fiscal deficits. The Centre needs to unleash more stimulus packages, but it cannot delay the dues of states; according to some reports, GST compensation is late by a few months, which is unpardonable. It should either rush to support states or let RBI come up with a solution. A financial emergency, costing states their autonomy, is undesirable.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Custodial death: Jeyaraj and Bennix shouldn’t have been remanded to any custody, writes P Chidambaram
2Inside Track | Is Cabinet reshuffle on the cards by August?
3Are Liverpool the greatest team in the English Premier League history?