​​​
  1. BT Cotton Seed Price Control: How seed companies shot themselves in the foot

BT Cotton Seed Price Control: How seed companies shot themselves in the foot

The realisation may have dawned upon seed companies that they erred by inviting the government to play the referee. They should have sorted out differences with Mahyco Monsanto Biotech at their level.

By: | Published: March 15, 2018 3:24 AM
BT cotton seeds, cotton seeds, cotton seed companies, Maharashtra bans co-marketing In August 2015, its 27 members had asked the National Seed Association of India (NSAI), led by chairman M Prabhakar Rao of Nuziveedu Seeds, to petition the agriculture ministry to bring Bt cotton seed under price control nationally.

In August 2015, its 27 members had asked the National Seed Association of India (NSAI), led by chairman M Prabhakar Rao of Nuziveedu Seeds, to petition the agriculture ministry to bring Bt cotton seed under price control nationally. The ministry obliged in December of that year. Three months later, it cut the price of Bollgard-II (BG-II) cotton seed by 4% to Rs 800 per pack, even while slashing the trait fee payable by seed companies to the technology provider, Mahyco Monsanto Biotech (MMB), by 70% from Rs 163 per pack to Rs 49. Seed companies rejoiced. The move has boomeranged. The government has clawed back some of the gains it had passed on from MMB to seed companies. In a late night notification on Monday, it cut the price of BG-II cotton seed by Rs 60 to Rs 740. Seed companies will take a hit of Rs 50 per pack; MMB will lose Rs 10 for the genetically modified (GM) insecticidal Bt trait it licenses. The realisation may have dawned upon seed companies that they erred by inviting the government to play the referee. They should have sorted out differences with MMB among themselves. These differences are mainly between Rao and Monsanto. According to a Reuters report of March 2017, Rao had, in April 2015, planned to take his company public. It says Nuziveedu Seeds had filed a draft prospectus in preparation and had sought a 10% cut in royalty from MMB, but the latter had not obliged. That had angered Rao.

In November 2015, MMB terminated the franchises of Rao’s three companies for not paying trait fees as contracted. Rao maintains that they are not obliged to pay more than the fee prescribed by the state and central governments. This contention has been upheld by the Delhi High Court, but is under challenge before a larger bench. The NSAI had wanted the trait fees to be abolished on the grounds that it does not work against pink bollworm, which has extensively damaged the cotton crop in Maharashtra. As for American bollworm, another deadly cotton pest, the NSAI said that the predecessor technology, BG-I, is effective against it, and since it has gone off patent, no trait fees are payable, and farmers can use it instead. Abolishing fees on patented traits would have questioned India’s respect for intellectual property rights. It would have had chilling effects on investors, and possibly angered the US government. The NSAI had also wanted BG-II to be denotified, but Nagpur’s Central Institute for Cotton Research and representatives of the Gujarat government had said during a meeting last year that it had not lost its potency, and pink bollworm in BG-II plants could be contained by following certain practices.

The NSAI had sought a price hike to `945. The Federation of Seed Industry of India (FSII), which broke away from the NSAI in August 2016 on the issue of price control and trait patents, wanted the maximum retail price raised to Rs 875, but would have settled for Rs 850. Both are disappointed. “It is a shock to us,” said M Ramasami, the chairman and managing director of the Salem, Tamil Nadu-based Rasi Seeds, and the president of the FSII, reacting to the agriculture ministry’s notification. Trait fees “were less than 1.5% of the cost of cultivation for farmers. It is unfortunate that today’s order further erodes trait fees, which are now less than 0.5% of the cost of cultivation, while the technology continues to provide value to farmers,” Arun Gopalakrishnan, the spokesperson of MMB said in an emailed statement. The newly notified prices do not even account for inflation over the past two years, Ashwani Yadav, the executive director of the FSII, said. The NSAI’s comments could not be obtained. Multiple calls to its executive director, Kalyan Goswami, went unanswered.

An agriculture ministry official, who didn’t want to be named, said that seed companies, by their own admission, were paying Rs 330 per pack to farmers producing the seed. The balance of Rs 371, minus the trait fee of Rs 39, would leave them with enough profit after accounting for distributor and dealer margins, marketing and packing costs, financing charges and overheads. Many of the seed companies claim R&D costs without actually undertaking any research, he said. While admitting this was true of most seed companies, Ramasami said the bigger players in the acutely competitive cotton seed market owe their position to the research they undertake. Rasi Seeds, he said, employed 10 cotton seed breeders, who were doing research on a 120-acre plot in Salem. They are supported by a staff of 15. The increase in India’s cotton production was mainly due to high-yielding varieties developed by Indian research-based seed companies. MMB’s Bt trait had helped by protecting those yields from bollworm attack. One of Rasi’s best-selling cotton seed hybrids, RCH-659, was brought to the market in 2012 after more than 10 years of breeding activity. But it took three years of demonstration and education in good agronomic practices for it to catch the fancy of farmers. Continuous research is required for a hybrid to remain ahead of the competition, Ramasami said.

Not all cotton seed is sold at the maximum retail price. But companies that maintain trait purity and germination quality above the government-notified standards do not discount their prices by much. Last year, as many as 40 million packets were sold. Assuming that they were all sold at highest permitted price (which is not the case), the industry would suffer a setback of Rs 200 crore. MMB would take a hit of Rs 40 crore. Bt cotton seed prices were brought under price control for the first time in 2006. At that time, it was retailing for Rs 1,800 a pack and the trait fee was Rs 1,200. Farmers complained, and the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission and state governments intervened.

Agriculture minister Radha Mohan Singh has taken a shine to price cuts after farmers’ agitation in Madhya Pradesh last June. On the day, five persons were killed in police firing in Mandsaur, while he was in Motihari in Bihar doing yoga with Swami Ramdev. When reporters asked his comments, he reportedly said, “Yoga kijiye” (perform yoga). Thereafter, in an effort to manage the optics, he cancelled a visit to China and told pesticide manufacturers to reduce the prices. Seed companies voluntarily offered to discount prices (other than those of price controlled Bt cotton seed) by 10%.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Go to Top