Presently only the Central Government employees are allowed to claim deduction under Section 80C for contribution made towards the Tier II account of NPS with a lock in of three years.
The government should introduce amendments to take care of these anomalies to make NPS just and fair for each category of subscribers.
The Union Budget 2021 will be presented on 1st February. So, I thought of making some suggestions to remove some anomalies and inequalities in the Income Tax Act provisions to make the National Pension System fair and a little better for everyone. Here are my suggestions.
Uniformities of tax treatment of retirement corpus of Tier I of NPS with Employee Provident Fund (EPF)
The Employee Provident Fund (EPF) scheme was introduced for all the employees in the organized sector to help them accumulate funds for retirement. Another system – National Pension System (NPS) – was introduced in 2004, initially for government employees and was then extended for all the Indian citizens. Under the EPF scheme the subscriber gets whole of the accumulated funds to his credit as tax-free at his retirement with full freedom to invest the it the way he wants, whereas the NPS subscriber gets only upto 60% of the accumulated balance in his NPS account at the time of retirement as tax-free and for the balance 40% he has to mandatorily buy an annuity from any life insurance company registered with IRDA.
In my opinion, why should the government dictate the subscribers of one scheme as to where he should invest his retirement corpus and let him get full liberty to use the way he wishes in the other scheme. This becomes important specially looking at the fact that the annuities of insurance companies generally do not give you returns which are able to beat the inflation and moreover it is fully taxable in the hands of the annuitant.
Investments in mutual funds have become safer with evolution of mutual fund as an industry and strict monitoring by the regulator. The government should give the freedom to the NPS subscriber to invest in any product of their choice, including a restriction on complete withdrawal of the money so as to ensure that the whole of the corpus is not put to risk. This should apply to subscribers of both the schemes.
Suggestion as regards tax provisions for Tier II account
The withdrawals from Tier I of NPS are tax-free upto 60% and the balance 40% has to be used for buying an annuity. But there is no clear cut provision in the Income Tax Act about how withdrawals from Tier II account should be taxed. Since these are not the mutual fund products, for which there exist exact rules, there is confusion about taxation of Tier II withdrawals. There is no clarify as to whether the same can be treated as equity product and thus entitled to concessional rate of taxes in case the subscriber has opted for 75% or more equity component. Complete clarity will go a long way in clearing the clouds around Tier II account taxation. The government should immediately bring in clarity about taxation of withdrawals from Tier II account of NPS. Some expert opine that the full value should be taxed which in my opinion is absurd, but then clear cut provisions will help us bring in clarify about it.
Presently only the Central Government employees are allowed to claim deduction under Section 80C for contribution made towards Tier II account with a lock in of three years. The same option is not available to other subscribers. Why such a step motherly treatment is given to other subscribers is beyond my comprehension. Is it because the people who draft the tax laws happen to be the Central government employees? All the eligible subscribers should be allowed tax benefit for contribution towards the Tier II account, specially when the Tier II account offers you less risky products as compared with other products of the same tenure, i.e. ELSS in case the subscriber opts for predominantly debt portion in the Tier II account.
Uniformity of ceiling for employer’s contribution
Tax benefits for contribution towards the Tier I account, for employer’s contribution for the Central government employees, are available upto 14% but when it comes to other employees, they are capped at 10% which is eligible for deduction under Section 80CCD(2). This again shows that the scheme is framed to favor the Central government employees as compared to all the other category of employees. I do not find any apparent reason for this partiality. The government should make the employer’s contribution upto 14% tax eligible for all category of employees.
I feel that the government should introduce amendments to take care of these anomalies to make the scheme just and fair for each category of subscribers.
(The writer is a tax and investment expert, and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org)