Putting two satellites into the wrong orbit, resulting in their total loss, the Indian Space Research Organization’s (ISRO) new Small Satellite Launch Vehicle (SSLV) rocket launch raised several questions. , and one among them is if the organisation needs to be really dealing in smaller satellite launchers.
The SSLV rocket, costing about Rs 56 crore and capable of carrying satellites weighing 500 kg or less, is intended for the country’s commercial and strategic needs.
ISRO’s struggle with small satellite launch vehicles
The SSLV launch brings back the older memories of the Satellite Launch Vehicle (SLV) and its bigger brother, the Augmented Satellite Launch vehicle (ASLV), which have troubled ISRO in the past. Based on the information in public domain, the ASLV project was started by India in the early 1980s to ultimately develop the technologies needed to put payloads into geostationary orbit. ISRO did not have sufficient funds for the Polar Satellite Launch Vehicle program (PSLV). But the ASLV program was terminated after initial development flights and is not a particularly successful project.
ASLV was discontinued after the PSLV became the workhorse.
Why does ISRO want to return to smaller satellite launchers?
The Indian Space Promotion and Authorisation Centre (IN-SPACe) has authorised two Indian commercial enterprises, ushering in the country’s private space sector launches. One Indian private sector company Skyroot is developing a launcher to do the same job which SSLV is doing, although it is still in development. ISRO could give its technology to the highest Indian private sector bidder, as a lot of them are starting space businesses and get on with its focus on projects like developing heavier launch vehicles and interplanetary missions. NASA is already doing this, and ISRO should also follow.
What is next?
In the future, the space agency is expected to launch the SSLV from the upcoming spaceport in Kulasekarapattinam located in Tamil Nadu. This would now allow the rocket to enter into a pole-to-pole, or polar, orbit in a straight geodesic over Earth.
Why did the SSLV-D1 launch fail?
Following the mission’s failure, according to the media Isro chairman S Somanath said that instead of a circular 356 km orbit, SSLV-D1 put the satellites in an elliptical 356 km x 76 km orbit. The lowest point close to the earth’s surface is 76 kms. He has contended that the satellites deployed in such an orbit will fall within a short amount of time, and two satellites have already left this orbit and can no longer be used.
The inability of the logic to recognize sensor failure and take rescue action, according to Isro, produced a divergence. The committee will investigate and make recommendations and based on the recommendations, the space agency is expected to return with SSLV-D2 soon.
The ISRO chairman has said that an expert panel would look into the failure and determine why it entered an unacceptable orbit. After making minor fixes and re-checking the fixes, Isro will soon start the next run of SSLV. All the rocket’s three stages/motors and all other systems worked well, he has said.
What went wrong?
The accelerometer measurement revealed an abnormality right at the instant of the second stage’s separation. According to reports, Isro chairman has said that the onboard computer concluded that the accelerometer had failed when it displayed such an abnormality. Then it initiated a process known as the salvage operation.
It then commences what is known as open loop guidance instead of closed loop guidance. That is, it functions in an open loop guiding from that point [of failure] until salvage. There is already a path in the computer that should be followed in order to reach the satellite. So instead of looking for acceleration data, [the rocket] will just follow that course. Once this happens, the capacity to place the satellite in the proper orbit is slightly limited.
So, towards the finish of the next stage firing, the computer believes/assumes that it cannot continue any further but must somehow separate the satellite after the burning of the motor. This is not a liquid stage (it means, it is not powered by liquid propellants). It’s a solid rocket (with solid propellants).
However, the solid motor cannot be stopped in the middle. The computer will wait until the current firing of the solid motor is done. The abnormality occurred at the completion of the second stage. As a result, the computer wants the third stage of firing to be completed. The satellites are sent into orbit as soon as they are completed. And that is what it did.
Everything in the rocket worked. All of the phases were successful. All of the propulsion systems worked. All of the sequences were successful.
The only problem was that the computer within determined that the accelerometer had failed owing to an irregularity in the accelerometer. As a result, it activated a salvage option, which shifted the satellite into an incorrect orbit. So there was no problem with the rocket.
He refuted that SSLV was carrying satellites weighing about 500 kg together, which were heavier than it could carry. He said that there were absolutely no issues with the vehicle’s aerodynamics. Control systems all worked very well, he said.