Supreme Court rejects Jindal Power plea over Rs 1,793 crore payout

By: |
December 18, 2014 6:11 PM

The Supreme Court on Thursday turned down a plea by the Jindal Power Ltd (JPL).

Failure by Jindal firms to pay the money Cound debar them from participating in the future auction of coal blocks. (PTI)Failure by Jindal firms to pay the money Cound debar them from participating in the future auction of coal blocks. (PTI)

The Supreme  Court on Thursday turned down a plea by the Jindal Power Ltd (JPL) to grant it an additional time of 36 months to shell out Rs 1,793 crore additional levy imposed  by the court.

JPL and its parent company, Jindal Steel & Power Ltd (JSPL), need to pay the penalty Rs 1,793 crore at the rate of Rs 295 per metric ton for illegal mining. JPL operates two coal blocks, Gare Palma IV/2 and IV/3, and JSPL has one block, Gare Palma IV/1, in Chhattisgarh.

A bench led by Justice Madan B Lokur refused to give any indulgence to the Jindal firms and asked them to comply with the court mandated deadline of December 31.

The court also junked a proposal mooted by the Jindal firms, during the hearing, to give them at least 17 more months and they cound pay a monthly installment of Rs 100 crore.

Notably, failure by Jindal firms to now pay the money Cound debar them from participating in the future auction of coal blocks since the Coal Ordinance states companies would be permitted in the auction only after they discharge their liability towards additional levy.

In the application, JPL had said it was required to pay Rs 1,024.54 crore as additional levy with respect to its blocks Gare Palma IV/2 and IV/3, and Rs 768.83 crore would be the levy with respect to coal block Gare Palma IV/1, which is operated by JSPL.

As per the plea, the penalty to be paid by them is the “highest among the operational coal block allottees” and it would comprise about 20 per cent of the total additional levy sought to be collected from all operational coal blocks that stand de-allocated.

In the application, which will come up for hearing on Thursday, JPL asked for a time frame of three years to make the payment in 36 equal monthly installments, while also raising apprehensions it may have to close down a few plants if the court does not allow its prayer. It had also pleaded for permission to participate in the future auction of the coal blocks without getting disqualified on the basis of not paying the levy by the deadline.

While scrapping allocation of 214 out of 218 coal blocks, the court had ordered allottees to cough up a penalty of Rs 295 per metric ton of coal extracted as additional levy, as assessed by the Comptroller and Auditor General. It had sought payment by December 31 and also held the coal extracted till March 31, 2015 will also attract the additional levy.

“The payment of additional levy is humongous and back-breaking, which is forcing the applicant to financial ruin. The imposition of such a levy was unexpected and the applicant has not made any provision in the books of account … if this Hon’ble Court does not extend the time to pay the additional levy, grave prejudice would be caused in not only carrying out its expansion plans, payment of debts but also in carrying out operations,” the plea had state.

It added that the “financial distress” may lead to closure of its plants, which would also have severe impact on 50,000 families of JPL and JSPL employees. It said that its credit rating had already been downgraded and banks were extremely cautious owing to the uncertainty of coal supplies.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1PlayStation 5 India restock on July 26: How and where to reserve your PS5 unit
2Draft E-commerce Rules: Traders’ body CAIT suggests changes to make proposed amendments ‘more impactful’
3HDFC Bank’s Puri top earner among bankers in FY21; ICICI Bank’s Bakhshi forgoes salary in COVID year