McLeod Russel insolvency: NCLAT admits promoter’s plea but no stay on CIRP

By: |
August 27, 2021 5:45 AM

The appellate tribunal, however, has not granted a stay on the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiation against McLeod Russel, one of the world’s largest tea producers and a group company of financially stressed Williamson Magor group.

The bench also heard an application for a stay of the NCLT order which approved the commencement of the insolvency proceedings against McLeod.The bench also heard an application for a stay of the NCLT order which approved the commencement of the insolvency proceedings against McLeod.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has admitted debt-laden teamaker McLeod Russel promoter Aditya Khaitan’s appeal against the insolvency proceedings order passed by the New Delhi bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT).

The appellate tribunal, however, has not granted a stay on the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiation against McLeod Russel, one of the world’s largest tea producers and a group company of financially stressed Williamson Magor group.

NCLT, New Delhi bench, vide its order dated August 6, admitted the insolvency application filed by Techno Electric & Engineering, a financial creditor, under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). Under the provision of IBC, the bench appointed Kanchan Dutta as the interim resolution professional (IRP) for McLeod.

The financial creditor had filed the insolvency application after the tea company defaulted on repayments of term loans of `100 crore and interest thereon.
Appearing before the NCLAT bench of Justices Jarat Kumar Jain and Ashok Kumar Mishra on August 25, senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, for appellant Khaitan, submitted that the respondent had no locus or authority to apply to Section 7 of the IBC as there is no financial debt and the corporate debtor (McLeod Russel) has not committed any default.

The bench also heard an application for a stay of the NCLT order which approved the commencement of the insolvency proceedings against McLeod.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for respondent Techno Electric and Engineering, vehemently opposed the admission of Khaitan’s appeal as well as the stay application.

“We have considered the submissions, the appeal is admitted for hearing, however, we will consider the application for a stay after filing reply by the respondent,” the NCLAT bench said in its order dated August 25.

Sibal sought 10 days to file a reply, which was granted. The matter was fixed “for admission (after notice)” on September 8.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Are bad banks really good?
2Xiaomi’s new Civi phone packs a Snapdragon 778, supports 55W fast charging and looks oddly familiar
3Commercial mining: Govt launches ‘2nd attempt’ of auction process for 11 coal mines