​​​
  1. Home buyers can’t wait indefinitely for possession, says National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Home buyers can’t wait indefinitely for possession, says National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission

Home buyers cannot be made to wait indefinitely for possession of flats booked by them, the apex consumer commission has said as it asked a private builder to refund the amount paid by its customers.

By: | New Delhi | Published: December 10, 2017 10:57 AM
Unitech, real estate, Supreme Court, Sanjay Chandra, National Company Law Tribunal, Unitech takeover, homebuyers, jaypee, amarpali, insolvency and bankruptcy code The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) noted that possession was not given even after five years and asked New Delhi-based Adel Landmarks Limited to refund over Rs 66 lakh to five customers who were allotted flats in their project in Gurgaon in 2012. (Reuters)

Home buyers cannot be made to wait indefinitely for possession of flats booked by them, the apex consumer commission has said as it asked a private builder to refund the amount paid by its customers. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) noted that possession was not given even after five years and asked New Delhi-based Adel Landmarks Limited to refund over Rs 66 lakh to five customers who were allotted flats in their project in Gurgaon in 2012. “The firm has chosen not to come forward to tell this commission as to why it has failed to deliver possession to them, and by which date it expects to deliver the possession, the buyers in my opinion are entitled to refund of the amount paid by them to the opposite party (firm), along with appropriate compensation,” the bench headed by its presiding member Justice V K Jain said. The commission also imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the builder which would be given to the five home buyers — Chirag Grover, Kamalpreet Singh Sethi, Ramesh Kumar, Raj Kumar and Dharmesh Jain. “Even if I take a period of five years from the initial allotment for delivery of the possession, the facts remains that the firm has failed to complete the construction and offer possession of the flat… “The persons cannot be made to wait indefinitely for the possession of the flats allotted to them and they are entitled to seek refund of the amount paid by them, along with compensation,” the judge said.

According to the complaint filed by the home buyers, they were allotted flats in the Gurgaon project of the firm in 2012. However, the project was scrapped and the firm later allotted them flats in another project with an extended delivery date. The commission noted that the firm failed to even finish the alternative project within a reasonable time frame.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Go to Top