Celebrities & brand endorsements: Where does the buck stop?

By: |
May 01, 2016 6:21 AM

Unanimity that endorsers should be responsible for false or exaggerated product claims, but industry insiders feel criminal charges too harsh

M S Dhoni, M S Dhoni amrapali, Amrapali Sapphire, Amrapali Sapphire housing society, Amrapali, Amrapali Noida, Amrapali housing society, Amrapali Sapphire noida, AmrapaliMisuseDhoni, M S Dhoni brand ambassador, mahendra singh dhoni, dhoni amrapali, m s dhoni amrapali, m s dhoni net worthA few days back, MS Dhoni disassociated himself with realty firm Amrapali after complaints from residents of Amrapali’s Saphhire project in Noida reached the sportsman on social media. (PTI)

Should celebrities endorsing brands be held responsible for any false claims the product company makes is one issue that is generating a lot of heated debate.

The Parliamentary Standing Committee’s report on the Consumer Protection Bill 2015 suggested that celebrity brand endorsers should be fined and/or jailed if found guilty of endorsing misleading ads. The report states that for a first-time offence, the celebrity may be penalised with either a fine of Rs 10 lakh or imprisonment of up to two years, or both. For a second-time offence, the penalty gets raised to Rs 50 lakh and up to five years of imprisonment, adds the report.

However, industry insiders hold a less harsh view. Piyush Pandey, executive chairman and creative director, Ogilvy & Mather, suggests that the primary task should be to carefully define and understand the term ‘misleading’. Next, endorsers need to be proactive in acquiring information that substantiates the claims made by a company.

“Something like this has to be assessed on a case-to-case basis,” Pandey tells FE. “When a celebrity endorses a car, he does not necessarily know what the mechanics of the car are. The same applies when they are endorsing a food product that has been in the market for 10 to 20 years. A celebrity cannot be held responsible if, say, an airbag of a car fails to open, something which he or she is not an expert at,” he says.

Srinivasan Swamy, chairman and managing director, RK Swamy BBDO, and president, IAA India Chapter, lists out the chain of liability when he says, “Brand endorsers should be held accountable, but they certainly are not the prime bearers of responsibility; rather they are accomplices of an exaggerated claim. Penalising in the form of a fine seems adequate, but it should be seen as a civil offence rather than a criminal one.”

Anand Halve, co-founder, Chlorophyll, notes that the issue goes beyond holding a brand’s face responsible. “In case corrective action needs to be taken, there should be a due process of appeal available,” he says. “In the meantime, the association between the company and the brand ambassador can be suspended when the matter is in observation.

The piece of communication must also be suspended till the matter is resolved and the suspension should be communicated to the audience.”

Some feel that if the controversy is to do with a product that makes specific functional claims, then it is very important to make the brand ambassador responsible. “To that extent, brand ambassadors should be a lot more careful and they should ensure due diligence on the company that is making the claims,” says Sunil Alagh, founder and chairman, SKA Advisors. He maintains that while a jail term might not be the best way forward, the endorser should return all the monetary compensation they have received from the company to the government.


Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1CSB Bank reports highest-ever net profit of Rs 218.40 crore for FY21
2Bandhan Bank Q4 profit falls 80% to Rs 103.03 crore on higher provisions
3DCB Bank profit rises 13pc to Rs 78 cr in January-March