The Yes Bank litigation and how it will change the restructuring landscape

By Tanushree Pande

The ‘Yes Bank’ restructuring plan which is being currently litigated before the Hon’ble Supreme Court is being closely monitored by India Inc.  The outcome of the case will have a paradigm effect on the principles of corporate finance in India. To begin with, the key principle of corporate finance is that in the event of liquidation, equity shareholders will be paid out after all other claims against the company have already been paid. With equity, we understand high risks and high rewards. The equity shareholders are last to be paid in the order of priority and that is precisely the reason why equity is considered the most volatile mode of investment. In Yes Bank’s case the Hon’ble Bombay High Court while overseeing the Bank’s restructuring plan was seized with this issue of prioritization.

The RBI had written off the entire value of the Bond Holders giving precedence to the Equity Holders. It is interesting to note that such prioritization of equity shareholders over bondholders was experienced in the recent past by the Swiss National Bank in Credit Suisse’s rescue plan wherein the existing hierarchical setup went through an alteration and the equity holders were given precedence over the bondholders even though the common equity instruments are the first in the order of priority to absorb losses. Though this occurred in a jurisdiction outside India, it led to the sprouting of issues in the Indian context. In the background of ‘Yes Bank’ the bondholders currently hold non-convertible perpetual bonds yielding interest at the rate of 9.5 percent. The ruling of the Supreme Court and the law laid down by it on the Bond holder’s status in such a scenario will have a significant effect on the Indian corporate restructuring scenario in India.  

Also Read

UPI to account for 90% of retail digital payments by 2026-27: PwC India report

After initial hiccups, 3 payments banks turn profitable

RBI slaps Rs 84.5-lakh fine on Central Bank

City Union Bank PAT up 4% to Rs 218 cr

The approach of the Apex Court will also provide much-needed clarity to investors regarding what they should expect while buying a bond or an equity share of a bank in the future. It may further be noted that the decision of the Apex Court will bring a question in the minds of the existing bondholders of commercial banks in India, whether to redeem the bonds or to switch to equity.

Should we assume that in the coming days investing in bonds will be riskier than equity in the future? How long will the bondholders have to fight their battles against the behemoth of the banking sector across various legal forums in the country in the hope to save their investments? Perhaps we will all have to wait for the final outcome of this issue in the hands of the Apex Court.

(The Author is a Corporate Lawyer and leads the Corporate Practice of ‘Agriya Law Chambers, New Delhi)