The petrol-powered Honda City is a great car, but is it good enough to justify its premium over the do-it-all Maruti Ciaz?
Honda City vs Maruti Ciaz: The petrol-powered Honda City is a great car, but is it good enough to justify its premium over the do-it-all Maruti Ciaz?
As far as mid-size sedans go, Maruti has never managed to make a dent in the segment. The Baleno was too expensive and the SX4 wasn’t efficient enough to compete with its rivals. With its latest offering, Maruti has made sure it hasn’t faltered on any of those counts, and the Ciaz is easily its best shot at finally cracking the segment that has long eluded it. The Ciaz is big, well equipped and, with a price tag of R8.59 lakh for the top-spec ZXi (O) petrol trim, competitively priced too. Trouble is, the competition has grown stronger. We mean the Honda City—a car that has dominated this class through its generations. The City is well engineered, has a bomb of a petrol engine and is hard to fault. But, at a price of Rs 9.91 lakh for this top VX variant, the petrol City is Rs 1.3 lakh more expensive than the Ciaz. Can the Honda justify its premium?
What are they like inside?
The Ciaz’s uncluttered and European-inspired dashboard looks elegant. Yes, some parts such as the window switches and trip computer are shared with the Swift but, overall, the quality and fit and finish will leave most customers content. Between the two, we preferred the Ciaz’s dash, and its coherent architecture, over the City’s busy design. What is missing on the Maruti, though, is a colour screen interface, which the City gets.
The front seats on the Maruti also feel a bit too high even in their lowest setting, which may make finding an ideal driving position a touch difficult for taller folk. And while the front chairs are pretty comfortable, they are nowhere near as supportive as the City’s. Both cars have fantastic legroom at the rear and would make a great buy for the chauffeur driven. There’s almost an excess of legroom in the Ciaz—with the front seats fully pushed back, even taller passengers won’t find knee room in short supply.
The City’s rear bench is easily the most comfortable in this class. Sure, it doesn’t have as much knee room as the Ciaz, but it is more than enough, and the ample cushioning, generous thigh support and a nicely judged backrest angle make it a relaxing place. Similarly, the front seats are very comfortable and it’s easy for most people to get into a good driving position. The busy, asymmetric design of the dashboard draws mixed reactions. The unique touch interface for the climate control looks modern but you have to take your eyes off the road to operate it. The overall material quality is patchy.
How do they drive?
On paper, the Ciaz’s 91 bhp, 1.4-litre engine looks underpowered stacked up against the City’s 117 bhp, 1.5-litre motor. Maruti’s engine is the same basic unit as the one in the Ertiga but Maruti has tinkered with it to improve responsiveness at low speeds. So within urban confines the difference in power doesn’t feel as stark and, surprisingly, the Ciaz feels sprightlier in slow-moving, stop-and-go traffic. The Ciaz performs well on the highway too, but the motor doesn’t like to be pushed hard and punches best between 2,500 and 5,000 rpm. The five-speed manual gearbox shifts smoothly but the clutch, though light, isn’t as effortless as the City’s.
On the other hand, the City loves the open roads and this is where its extra 26 horses immediately show up. The Honda’s engine loves to spin fast and delivers its best when pushed. The dizzy 7,000 rpm redline combined with a big dose of power near the limit gives the City a big advantage during flat-out acceleration. The City’s motor sounds sporty and enjoyable when spun hard, but under regular driving conditions, the Ciaz’s cabin is quieter and better-insulated from road, engine and traffic noise.
Ride & handling
Like the engine, the Ciaz’s suspension does its job quietly too. The Maruti’s nicely tuned suspension easily flattens most of what our roads throw at it and even sharper edges are dealt with impressively. At higher speeds, the Ciaz feels like a larger, heavier car than the City. The City tends to pitch a bit more than the Ciaz, but never to the point of feeling uncomfortable or unsafe. The Honda’s straight-line stability is good too, though the suspension doesn’t handle sharper bumps as well (or quietly) as the Ciaz’s. But while the Maruti comes out on top in terms of ride quality, the Honda gets our vote for handling. The City feels sportier as it dives into corners more readily.
The Ciaz’s steering, though well weighted, feels numb and unexciting once speed builds up. Handling, on the whole, is safe, but don’t expect it to thrill you like a City on twisty roads.
Buying & owning
In their range-topping trims, the Ciaz is a good Rs 1.3 lakh cheaper than the City. But as you go lower down the range, the price difference between the two reduces, with the base models priced R20,000 apart; the Ciaz VXi is priced at Rs 6.99 lakh to the City E’s Rs 7.20 lakh. On the warranty front, both Maruti and Honda offer a two-year/40,000 km or warranty, but you can opt for an extended warranty programme on both for around Rs 10,000 extra. Remember, it is possible to negotiate with your dealer for the cost of extended warranty. Maruti’s after-sales service is second to none, giving the Ciaz a bit of an advantage here.
Equipment & safety
Both cars are well kitted and offer almost everything you would expect from a car at this price point. Both the City and the Ciaz get leather on their seats and steering wheels, auto climate control, steering-mounted audio and telephone controls, Bluetooth streaming, a reversing camera, rear defogger, keyless entry with push-button start and electrically adjustable and foldable wing mirrors. Additionally both cars pamper rear passengers with rear AC vents and a centre armrest with cupholders. However, while the City gets a reversing camera with a normal and wide view, it misses out on parking sensors. The Ciaz gets rear parking sensors but a single view reversing camera. Where the City scores over the Ciaz is that it offers a colour screen, sunroof and cruise control.
The Ciaz scores well when it comes to space, ride quality and cabin ambience. Even the engine feels peppy in an urban environment and isn’t bad on the highway either. The Ciaz’s trump card, though, is its price. It’s almost a lakh-and-a-half cheaper than the City and it doesn’t feel that way. However, when you bring the City into the picture, the Ciaz feels a bit bland. Its engine isn’t as exciting and, though practical, the car seems to somehow lack the desirability of the City.
The City doesn’t ride as well as the Ciaz and the cabin lacks a bit of finesse. But in all key areas such as passenger comfort (both at the front and rear) driving pleasure and equipment, it has a clear edge over the Maruti. Sure, it does come across as a bit pricey when compared to the Ciaz, but the premium feels justified, especially because the areas where the City betters the Ciaz are the areas that matter the most. The City is our pick.
– By WhatCar?