Apple wins digital music antitrust trial

By: |
Oakland | Updated: December 18, 2014 9:48 AM

Apple won an antitrust trial on Tuesday when a US jury decided the company did not...

The jury ruled Apple did not act improperly when it restricted music purchases for iPod usersThe jury ruled Apple did not act improperly when it restricted music purchases for iPod users

Apple won an antitrust trial on Tuesday when a US jury decided the company did not act improperly when it restricted music purchases for iPod users to Apple’s iTunes digital store.

The verdict was read in an Oakland, California federal court. The plaintiffs, a group of individuals and businesses who purchased iPods from 2006 to 2009, sought about $350 million in damages from Apple alleging the company unfairly blocked competing device makers.

Patrick Coughlin, an attorney for the plaintiffs, said “the jury called it like they saw it”.

In a statement, Apple applauded the verdict. “Every time we’ve updated those products — and every Apple product over the years — we’ve done it to make the user experience even better,” the company said.

Jurors deliberated for only a few hours on the sole question of whether the update had benefited consumers. Under US law, a company cannot be found anticompetitive if a product alteration was an improvement for customers.Since jurors agreed with Apple, they did not have to decide any other legal issues or damages. The trial included video deposition testimony given by Apple co-founder Steve Jobs shortly before he died in 2011.

Apple faced a challenge in the online music market from Real Networks, which developed RealPlayer, its own digital song manager, plaintiffs claimed. It included software which allowed music purchased there playable on iPods as well as competing devices.

Apple eventually introduced a software update that restricted the iPod to music bought on iTunes. Plaintiffs say that step discouraged iPod owners from buying a competing device when it came time to upgrade.

Apple argued the software update was meant to improve the consumer experience and contained many desirable features, including movies and auto-synchronisation.

Jurors declined to answer questions after the significant verdict which came exactly two weeks since the start of the trial. The plaintiffs are expected to appeal the decision, said Patrick Coughlin, an attorney for the plaintiffs.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Apple doubles down on HomePod ambitions, brings back former engineer to head software division
2D-Mart Q2 profit rises twofold to Rs 417 cr
3HDFC Bank Q2 consolidated profit rises 18 pc to Rs 9,096 cr