• Rajasthan

    Cong 99
    BJP 73
    RLM 3
    OTH 24
  • Madhya Pradesh

    Cong 113
    BJP 110
    BSP 2
    OTH 5
  • Chhattisgarh

    Cong 68
    BJP 15
    JCC 7
    OTH 0
  • Telangana

    TRS-AIMIM 95
    TDP-Cong 21
    BJP 1
    OTH 2
  • Mizoram

    MNF 26
    Cong 5
    BJP 1
    OTH 8

* Total Tally Reflects Leads + Wins

Ambuja Cement moves SC against Rs 6,300-cr CCI fine

By: | Published: September 13, 2018 5:10 AM

CCI had slapped Rs 6,700 cr penalty on 11 cement firms as well as the Cement Manufacturers Association for indulging in cartelisation

Ambuja Cement, supreme court, NCLAT, CMA, CCI, Cement Manufacturers Association CCI had imposed the highest penalty of Rs 1,175.49 crore on Aditya Birla group firm UltraTech. (PTI)

Ambuja Cement on Wednesday moved the Supreme Court against the NCLAT’s ruling that upheld the fair trade regulator CCI’s order to impose a penalty of Rs 6,700 crore for alleged cartelization on 11 manufacturers. In August 2016, CCI had slapped approximately Rs 6,700 crore penalty on 11 cement firms including UltraTech, ACC, Ambuja, Ramco and JK Cement as well as the industry body Cement Manufacturers Association (CMA) for indulging in cartelisation. CCI had imposed the highest penalty of Rs 1,175.49 crore on Aditya Birla group firm UltraTech.

Challenging the NCLAT’s July 25 order, Ambuja said that the tribunal failed to appreciate that where a private association of industry has been tasked to collate data which is not competitively sensitive and does not reduce strategic uncertainty, such data would become available to the members of the association.

“It bears emphasis that the question is not whether collection of data is per se illegal, the question is whether collection of data and facts and circumstances was sufficiently strong evidence of the existence of a cartel,” it stated. The tribunal erroneously accepted as an indicator of cartelization that “production fell drastically in all cases in November 2010-11 while that was not the case in November 2009-10”. In arriving at this finding, the tribunal abandoned the regional analysis, and instead, identified 7 states in different regions of India, and analysed data based on which no pattern emerges and ignored its submission that decreasing production is a phenomenon which depends on forecasting demand,” Ambuja said.

According to the company, the allegation of cartelization was based on data from 2007 onwards, which period was characterised by a range of increasing and decreasing dispatches for all the cement manufacturers. “A mere fall in dispatches is not sufficient evidence of an anti-competitive conduct; there would be a case for investigation if there was a uniform fall in dispatches accompanied by a uniform increase in price, which was not the case here,” it said.

In August 2016, the CCI ruled that 10 cement companies used the platform provided by the Cement Manufacturers Association and shared details relating to prices, capacity utilisation, production and dispatch and thereby restricted production and supplies in the market. It also imposed the penalty.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Switch to Hindi Edition