VVIP chopper case: Delhi court extends ED custody of AgustaWestland accused Rajeev Saxena by 4 days

By: |
New Delhi | Published: February 4, 2019 5:46:30 PM

The Delhi court had allowed his custodial interrogation after the agency alleged that he and another accused provided global corporate structure to launder money.

VVIP chopper case, Delhi court, ED, ED custody, Rajeev Saxena, AgustaWestland case, Enforcement Directorate, india newsDubai-based businessman Rajeev Saxena. (ANI)

A Delhi court Monday extended by four more days the ED custody of Rajeev Saxena, an accused in the Rs 3,600-crore AgustaWestland case. Saxena, a Dubai-based businessman, was extradited from Dubai on January 31 and sent to four-day custody of the Enforcement Directorate (ED) the same day. The court had allowed his custodial interrogation after the agency alleged that he and another accused provided global corporate structure to launder money.

The ED had alleged that in connivance with another accused, Guatam Khaitan, a Delhi-based lawyer, Saxena provided a global corporate structure for laundering illegal proceeds of the crime for payment to various political persons, bureaucrats and Air Force officials to influence the contract to supply 12 VVIP helicopters in favour of AgustaWestland.

On January 1, 2014, India scrapped the contract with Finmeccanica’s British subsidiary AgustaWestland for supplying 12 AW-101 VVIP choppers to the IAF over alleged breach of contractual obligations and charges of kickbacks of Rs 423 crore paid by it to secure the deal.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Next Stories
1Who is Rajeev Kumar and why does CBI want to quiz Kolkata Police Commissioner?
2Delhi weather today: Trains, flights delayed as thick fog engulfs national capital, AQI dips to poor category
3National Herald case: Sonia, Rahul Gandhi begin cross examination of complainant Subramanian Swamy