​​​
  1. Sedition case: Court rejects Hardik Patel’s discharge plea

Sedition case: Court rejects Hardik Patel’s discharge plea

A court in Ahmedabad today rejected Patidar leader Hardik Patel's discharge application in a sedition case.

By: | Ahmedabad | Published: February 21, 2018 4:34 PM
hardik patel, patidar leader hardik patel, ahmedabad court, gujarat, court rejects hardik patel plea, hardik patel plea rejected, india The court accepted the prosecution’s plea that there are material evidence against Hardik on the basis of which charges can be framed. (PTI)

A court here today rejected Patidar leader Hardik Patel’s discharge application in a sedition case filed against him by the Ahmedabad crime branch in connection with the violence during an agitation by his outfit in August 2015. Sessions court judge Dilip Mahida rejected Patel’s discharge application, thereby allowing framing of charges against him in the case. The Patidar Anamat Andolan Samiti (PAAS) leader is currently out on bail granted to him by the high court in June 2016.

The court accepted the prosecution’s plea that there are material evidence against Hardik on the basis of which charges can be framed.

The court said that evidence against the accused in the form of speeches, conversations and forensic evidence establish that Hardik and two others — Dinesh Bambhania and Chirag Patel — had hatched a conspiracy and used pressure and threat to force the government to accept their demands.

The court also considered the deposition made by another co-accused-turned-approver, Ketan Patel, as evidence against the accused and said that a case was made out against Hardik, Dinesh and Chirag under sections 121 (A) (conspiracy to overawe the state or central government, by means of criminal force or the show of criminal force), 124 (A) (sedition), and 120 (B) (criminal conspiracy).

Hardik, who is the convener of PAAS, had moved his plea in an Ahmedabad court seeking discharge in the case on the ground that there was no evidence against him for framing of charges and that the prosecution case against him did not hold ground.

He has been accused of inciting violence with intention to dislodge the government after a rally addressed by him turned violent in August 2015. At least 13 people had died in the violence.

The high court had earlier dismissed Hardik’s petition seeking quashing of the FIR in the same case. Hardik had then moved the Supreme Court against the HC order.

Hardik was granted bail by the High Court in June 2016.

On January 18, 2016, the city crime branch had filed a charge sheet of around 2,700 pages against Hardik Patel, Dinesh Bambhania, Ketan Patel and Chirag Patel. They were charged with sedition and criminal conspiracy.

The high court had also upheld sedition charges against Hardik while asking the police to scrap charges of promoting enmity between the two communities or groups as Hardik’s speeches for Patidars do not refer to hostility.

If convicted, the maximum punishment for the charges is life imprisonment.

In the charge sheet, the police had termed the quota agitation spearheaded by Hardik, as a “pre-planned conspiracy” that was hatched to put pressure on the state government to accept their “unconstitutional demand of quota”.

The police alleged that due to such activities of the PAAS leaders, 457 FIRs relating to arson, assault and rioting were filed across Gujarat between July 7 and December 3, 2016.

According to the charge sheet, property worth around Rs 40 crore was damaged in the violence.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

  1. No Comments.

Go to Top