Maratha quota hearing: Supreme Court reserves order, says all reservations may go but up to govts to decide

By: |
March 26, 2021 12:36 PM

During the hearing on Thursday, Justice Ashok Bhushan said that all reservations may go and only EWS (Economically Weaker Sections) may remain.

Supreme Court of IndiaSupreme Court of India

 

Maratha reservation: The Supreme Court has reserved its judgement on petitions challenging the constitutional validity of a Maharashtra law that grants reservation to the Maratha community in education and jobs. A five-judge Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court also reserved the judgement on the issue of whether the top court’s 1992 verdict of capping reservation at 50 per cent needs re-examination.

During the hearing on Thursday, Justice Ashok Bhushan said that all reservations may go and only EWS (Economically Weaker Sections) may remain. “You may be right. This may be a beginning. All reservations may go and only EWS (Economically Weaker Sections) may remain. But these are policy matters,” Bhushan said after Advocate Shriram P Pingle contended that caste-based reservations were being politicised.

Pingle told the bench that “the elephant that needs to be addressed in the room is caste”. The Indra Sawhney judgement, he said, recognised caste as a ground for extending reservations but the endeavour needs to be made to remove caste-based reservations in a phased manner. To this, the bench said these “thoughts” were “very radical and good” but it was for the government to take a decision that caste and reservation should go. “That is for Parliament and the legislature. It is a welcome idea…When the Constitution was enacted, the object was a caste-less, egalitarian society,” said Justice Bhushan.

Further, Pingle said the Mandal Commission list was used to include caste which did not exist in the state. After the Indra Sawhney judgment, he said, more than 100 castes were included. He said over-reservation was anti-reservation and added that the current case had a larger magnitude on the social life of the country, it may be appropriate to consider all the pending cases and take a holistic view.

However, Senior Advocate Shyam Divan, appearing for the petitioners opposing the Maratha reservation law, said that the Sawhney judgement need not be reconsidered. He said the 50 per cent limit should be retained. The country, he said, was more equal now than it was 70 years ago and the focus must now be on other forms of affirmative action. If the 50 per cent limit is breached, Diwan said, there will be political pressure not to reduce reservation.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Mamata Banerjee embroiled in fake secularism; time has come for her farewell: Amit Shah
2Haryana Deputy CM urges PM Modi to resume talks with protesting farmers
3Farmers’ Protest: Haryana Deputy CM Dushyant Chautala writes to PM Modi for resuming talks with farmers