Madras High Court’s remark on EC: SC says media cannot be restrained from reporting observations made during hearing

By: |
May 06, 2021 2:00 PM

Courts have to remain alive to evolving technology of the media and it is not good if it is restrained from reporting judicial proceedings, the bench said.

The verdict came on an appeal by the poll panel against the Madras High Court's observation.

The Supreme Court today said the question of expunging the Madras High Court’s critical remarks holding the Election Commission responsible for surge in COVID cases does not arise as they are not part of judicial order and also trashed the plea that media be restrained from reporting observations of court proceedings, saying it will be a ‘retrograde’ act.

A bench headed by Justice D Y Chandrachud acknowledged however that the high court’s remarks were ‘harsh’ and at times ‘off the cuff remarks are susceptible for misinterpretation’.

The bench, also comprising justice M R Shah, said the media cannot be restrained from reporting observations made during the course of hearings.

Lauding high courts for commendable work done by them in effectively supervising the COVID-19 pandemic management, the top court said: “It will be retrograde to restrain HCs from making observations or gagging media from reporting observations”.

Courts have to remain alive to evolving technology of the media and it is not good if it is restrained from reporting judicial proceedings, the bench said.

The apex court further stated that Article 19 of the Constitution not only gives the right to freedom of speech and expression to people but also confer the same right to media.

The verdict came on an appeal by the poll panel against the Madras High Court’s observation.

The high court had on April 26 castigated the EC for the surge in COVID-19 cases during the second wave of the pandemic, holding it “singularly” responsible for the spread of the viral disease, called it the “the most irresponsible institution” and even said its officials may be booked under murder charges.

While reserving the verdict on May 3, the bench had batted for “free flow of dialogue” in courts and said that it would neither restrain the media from reporting oral observations made during proceedings in public interest, nor demoralise high courts – “vital pillars of democracy” – by asking them to refrain from raising questions.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Punjab CM Capt Amarinder Singh gives government job to two ‘crorepatis’ on compassionate grounds
2Milkha Singh Demise: PM Modi, President Kovind, other political leaders pay tribute to ‘Flying Sikh’
3PM Narendra Modi likely to chair meeting with Jammu and Kashmir political parties on June 24: Officials