Elgar Parishad case: HC directs NIA to file reply on Sudha Bharadwaj’s bail plea by July 3

By: |
June 22, 2021 4:49 PM

The case was registered against her and some other activists under provisions of the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Elgar Parishad case, Sudha Bharadwaj's bail plea, Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act , harge sheet filed against Sudha Bharadwaj case, accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links caseBharadwaj was arrested on August 28, 2018 and has been in jail since then.

The Bombay High Court on Tuesday directed the National Investigation Agency to file its affidavit by July 3 in response to the bail petition of activist Sudha Bharadwaj, an accused in the Elgar Parishad-Maoist links case. Bharadwaj was arrested on August 28, 2018 and has been in jail since then.

The case was registered against her and some other activists under provisions of the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA).

Bharadwaj had sought default bail, contending the trial judge was not authorised to take cognisance of the 2019 charge sheet filed against her, as the judge was at that time not designated as special judge under the NIA Act to hear matters pertaining to the UAPA.

A division bench of Justices S S Shinde and N J Jamadar on Tuesday directed NIA’s advocate Sandesh Patil to file an affidavit in response to the petition and posted the matter for further hearing on July 3. In her petition, Bharadwaj relied on documents received from the high court under the Right to Information (RTI) Act to demonstrate that the court of Additional Sessions Judge Kishor Vadane in Pune was not authorised to take cognisance of the 1,800-page supplementary charge sheet filed by the Pune police in February 2019.

“This judge was not designated as a special NIA judge at the time and hence, could not have taken cognisance of the charge sheet. We are also challenging an earlier order passed by this judge in November 2018 granting the police time to file the charge sheet,” Bharadwaj’s counsel Yug Chaudhry argued.

The case relates to alleged inflammatory speeches delivered at the ”Elgar Parishad” conclave, held at Shaniwarwada in Pune on December 31, 2017, which the police claimed triggered violence the next day near the Koregaon-Bhima war memorial located on the city”s outskirts. The Pune police claimed the conclave was backed by Maoists.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) later took over the probe into the case.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Pegasus row: SC to hear batch of pleas seeking probe into alleged snooping
2Mamata writes to PM Modi on flood situation in West Bengal, seeks his intervention for upgrading dams
3Corruption case against Anil Deshmukh: Param Bir Singh moves HC to challenge panel’s summons