Candidates failing to put out advertisements listing their criminal records during electioneering could face contempt of court proceedings and those publishing wrong info about their rivals’ criminal antecedents could end up paying penalty for indulging in corrupt practices, the Election Commission has said.
Following a Supreme Court direction, the poll panel had on October 10 made it compulsory for candidates contesting polls to advertise their criminal antecedents in TV channels and newspapers at least three times during electioneering.
The Election Commission had earlier planned to implement in the five poll-bound states the Supreme Court direction asking all candidates to advertise their criminal records. The apex court had recently said that candidates contesting polls should repeatedly advertise their criminal antecedents in print and electronic media after filing nomination papers so that the people can make an informed decision.
Read: Mizoram elections: Election Commission seeks names for Chief Electoral Officer’s post
The directive comes into force in the assembly elections in five states, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Mizoram and Telangana, in November-December, PTI reported. According to the directive, political parties too will have to publicise criminal records of their candidates.
According to PTI, in a set of ‘frequently asked questions’ issued for the five poll-bound states, the commission has made it clear that candidates who do not have a criminal record or ongoing cases, need not issue advertisement. The candidates and their parties would have to bear the cost of advertisements and it would form part of their election expenditure.
Read: Assembly elections 2018: Twitter records 1.2 million tweets
If candidates or such political parties do not publicise in the manner prescribed, such failure may be a ground for post-election action like election petition or contempt of the Supreme Court. Any candidate or voter of a constituency can file an election petition in the high court of that state challenging the election of the winning candidate.
On the issue of “someone publishing false information about criminal cases of another candidate”, the EC said there are already provisions to deal with any case of publication of false statement in relation to a candidate, including Section 171G of the Indian Penal Code which deals with corrupt electoral practices and prescribes a fine for such offences.
Earlier in 2013, the Supreme Court had ruled that an MP, MLA will be disqualified immediately from the House after conviction in any criminal case and can’t contest elections for six years.