Calcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging D.Litt to Mamata Banerjee

By: |
Kolkata | Published: January 25, 2018 3:51:11 PM

In his submission, Mukherjee claimed that the CU senate was the final authority in deciding who would be an awardee and that anybody else was an outsider with no authority to challenge the decision.

Calcutta High Court, PIL, D.Litt, Mamata BanerjeeCalcutta High Court dismisses PIL challenging D.Litt to Mamata Banerjee

The Calcutta High Court today dismissed a PIL challenging the Calcutta University’s decision to confer D.Litt on West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee. A division bench comprising acting Chief Justice J Bhattacharya and Justice A Banerjee dismissed the PIL and observed that no public interest was harmed because of the decision. Banerjee was conferred the D.Litt degree at the university’s convocation ceremony on January 11. The court also noted that necessary parties had not been added in the petition. The petitioner alleged that the members of the university’s senate had erred in its decision, but none of them were made a party in the plea, the division bench said. During hearings in the case, earlier this month, state Advocate General Kishore Datta had questioned the maintainability of the petition, claiming that it was politically motivated and aimed at garnering media attention. Saktinath Mukherjee, the CU counsel, had stated that the petition was not justifiable and that it should be rejected forthwith as the university senate’s decision to grant the degree to Banerjee has not caused any injury to public interest.

In his submission, Mukherjee claimed that the CU senate was the final authority in deciding who would be an awardee and that anybody else was an outsider with no authority to challenge the decision. He said before the court that the achievements and eminence of a person were reasons enough for being chosen for the award. Petitioner Ranjugopal Mukherjee, a former professor of the CU, had contended that the decision of the syndicate or senate did not attribute any reason for conferring D.Litt on Banerjee and that it was “arbitrary and opaque”. Claiming that senate members were nominated by the state, his counsel Bikash Bhattacharya had submitted that in this case, “the nominated persons are nominating the nominator.”

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Home Minister Amit Shah speaks to all CMs, seeks their views on extension of lockdown
2India trashes Pakistan’s objection to commencement of construction of Ram temple
3Liquor baron hires 180-seater chartered plane for four family members to ‘avoid crowd’ at airport, flight