Babri Masjid-Ram Mandir dispute: Supreme Court tells parties to file written sub missions

By: |
New Delhi | Updated: March 23, 2017 11:13 AM

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked all the parties concerned to file their respective written submissions in the Babri Masjid-Ram Mandir dispute case.

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked all the parties concerned to file their respective written submissions in the Babri Masjid-Ram Mandir dispute case.

The Supreme Court on Thursday asked all the parties concerned to file their respective written submissions in the Babri Masjid-Ram Mandir dispute case. The bench in the apex court also said that the matter will be heard after two weeks.

The top Court was examining whether to revive the conspiracy charges against senior Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leaders Lal Krishna Advani, Murli Manohar Joshi, Uma Bharti, Kalyan Singh and others in the Babri Masjid demolition case. The apex court will hear the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI)’s plea against Allahabad High Court’s order dropping criminal conspiracy charges against the BJP leaders in the case.

Watch this video

There are two sets of cases – one against BJP veteran Advani and others who were on the dais at Ram Katha Kunj in Ayodhya on December 6, 1992 when the Babri mosque was demolished. The other case was against lakhs of ‘karsevaks’ (volunteers) who were in and around the disputed structure.

The CBI had chargesheeted Advani and 20 others under Sections 153A (promoting enmity between classes), 153B (imputations, assertions prejudicial to national integration) and 505 (false statements, rumours etc. circulated with the intent to cause mutiny or disturb public peace) of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
It had subsequently invoked charges under section 120B (criminal conspiracy) of IPC which was quashed by the special court whose decision was upheld by the high court.

Yesterday the apex court had suggested an out-of-court settlement of the lingering Ram Janam Bhumi-Babri Masjid land dispute at Ayodhya, observing that issues of “religion and sentiments” can be best resolved through talks.

Chief Justice J S Khehar also offered to mediate even as the bench headed by him suggested that the parties to the dispute adopt a “give a bit and take a bit” approach for a meaningful and sincere negotiations to resolve the issue.

The Lucknow bench of Allahabad High Court, in 2010, had ruled for a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acres area at the site in Uttar Pradesh.

(With agency inputs)

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1‘Hilarious if not tragic’, says Subramanian Swamy after Centre drops Parliament question on Chinese incursion citing national security
2Ordinance on extending tenure of CBI, ED chiefs won’t create nepotism, disparity in bureaucracy: Govt
3Akali Dal leader Manjinder Singh Sirsa joins BJP months ahead of Punjab assembly polls