Ayodhya case hearing: Will Ram Mandir case be referred to court-appointed mediator? SC order on March 5

By: |
Updated:Feb 26, 2019 2:41:17 pm

Ayodhya Case Verdict in Supreme Court: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that it will pass an order on March 5 whether the Ram Mandir case be referred to a court-appointed mediator.

Ayodhya Case Live Verdict, Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid Case LiveRam Mandir hearing today LIVE: Supreme Court to decide on whether to refer case to court-appointed mediator

Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case hearing: The Supreme Court on Tuesday said that it will pass an order on March 5 on whether the politically sensitive case of Ram Mandir be referred to a court-appointed mediator. Earlier, the court reiterated that it is in favour of a mediation on the matter as it is not only thinking about the ownership of land but also about healing relationships. “Even if there is one percent chance for mediation between parties, we should give it an opportunity,” Justice SA Bobde said.

But Hindus opposed the court’s suggestion, saying it has failed in the past. To this, Justice SA Bobde said, “We may decide a property but we are thinking more about healing relationships.”

Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan who was representing the Muslim litigant, however, said that his client was open to mediation. “If Your Lordships want to try it, I wont oppose it,” he said.

The court then directed all the parties involved in the Ram Mandir case to examine translated documents and point out objections, agreements with the translated documents within six weeks.

The court had on January 10 directed its registry to inspect the records that will come up before it in the process of hearing and make an assessment of the time that will be taken to make the case ready for hearing. It had also directed the registry to engage official translators and submit the report to the court.

Read More

Live Blog


    13:31 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    What Archaeological Survey of India said in its 2003 report?

    The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) had in a report submitted in 2003 suggested that a temple existed at the site. The Babri Masjid was demolished in December 1992.

    12:29 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ram Mandir hearing: 14 pleas in SC

    Fourteen appeals have been filed in the apex court against the 2010 Allahabad High Court judgment, delivered in four civil suits, that the 2.77-acre land in Ayodhya be partitioned equally among the three parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla.

    11:48 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    SC grants 6 weeks time to parties to examine translated documents

    The Supreme Court said that translated records have to be in place over which no controversy can be raised. It directed the parties to examine translated documents and point out objections, agreements with the translated documents within six weeks.

    11:44 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    We are thinking more about healing relationships, says SC on taking mediation route

    Justice SA Bobde said that "we may decide a property dispute but we are thinking more about healing relationships". But Hindu side points out all attempts of mediation have already failed in the past. They opposed mediation.

    11:42 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Subramanian Swamy makes submissions

    Subramanian Swamy told the court that a compromise has to include a minimum condition that Hindus will have a right to pray where Lord Ram was born.

    11:39 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ram Mandir hearing: Supreme Court allows Subramanian Swamy to make submissions

    BJP leader Subramanian Swamy tries to make submissions but Rajeev Dhavan objects saying he is not party to the case, his intervention was disallowed. CJI Gogoi, however, allows Swamy to make submissions.

    11:37 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Rajeev Dhavan says open to mediation, but others oppose

    Dushyant Dave told the court it is difficult. Rajeev Dhavan said, "If Your Lordships want to try it, I wont oppose it." CS Vaidyanathan also opposed the SC's suggection of mediation. "It has been tried not once but several times," Vaidyanathan said.

    11:30 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Supreme Court proposes mediation on Ram mandir issue

    Supreme Court proposes mediation on Ram mandir issue. The court said that even if there is 1% chances of amicable resolution, it should be given a try. "Even if there is one percent chance for mediation between parties, we should give it an opportunity," Justice Bobde said.

    11:29 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Examination of documents need 8 to 12 weeks, SC told

    Rajeev Dhavan said that "we have never examined the translations of Uttar Pradesh". Then CJI Gogoi asked: "What kind of a time frame are you looking at?" Senior advocate Dushyant Dave submits thay examination of documents can be done within a time frame of 8 to 12 weeks.

    11:17 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ram Mandir hearing: Rajeev Dhawan objects to two words

    Rajeev Dhavan takes some objection to the two words used against his party -- "Not bonafide" and "not appropriate". "This isn't a moment of acrimony. We are not adversarial. We are only trying to have the records presentable before this Court," he said.

    11:11 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    CS Vaidyanathan, representing Ram Lalla, argues against allowing more time

    Advocate CS Vaidyanathan, who represents Ram Lalla, refers to page 12 of 2017 order, says no objection on translation was raised by any AoR then. Now two years later they are coming up with this objection, he submits. Senior advocate Ranjit Kumar also argued against allowing more time for examination of translated documents.

    11:07 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Can proceed if there is consensus on documents: SC

    To this, the court said that it can proceed with hearing if there is consensus with regard to translation of documents. The CJI said that "we are not going to waste our time and time of this court if disputes are going to be raised regarding translation of the documents."

    11:04 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Hindus object to Muslim petitioner over translations

    After Muslim petitioner raised objection, Hindus tell that advocates on record from the other side have already examined translations submitted by the Uttar Pradesh government in 2017 and 2019.

    10:59 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Can't challenge translations once proceedings begin: SC

    The Supreme Court said that if translations of documents are now acceptable to all, parties cannot contest translations once proceedings begin.

    10:57 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Need to examine translations submitted by UP government: Muslim petitioner

    Senior advocate CS Vaidyanathan, who was appearing for Ram Lala, said that the translations are over. But Rajeev Dhavan who represents a Muslim petitioner, said that they need to first examine translations submitted by UP government.

    10:54 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ram Mandir hearing underway in SC

    After registry told the bench about translation of documents, the CJI said that he wants to know if parties are ready to go by copies submitted by each other in order to let Court proceed.

    10:51 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Still thousands of papers need to be translated: SC registry

    The SC registry informed the court that there are still thousands of papers that need to be translated by the official translators of the court.

    10:50 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    SC asks parties if they are ready to accept translated copies of case documents

    When the bench met, issue of translation of thousands of case papers comes up first. CJI Ranjan Gogoi asked both sides if they are willing to accept the translated copies submitted by Uttar Pradesh government and other parties. The CJI said: "We can hear this case only if there's an agreement on this point."

    10:39 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Hearing begins in Supreme Court

    According to news agency ANI, the Supreme Court has commenced hearing on politically sensitive Ram-Janambhoomi Babri Masjid land dispute case.

    10:38 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Crores of Indians want Ayodhya verdict 'sooner than later': BJP

    The BJP has said that crores of Indians believe the judiciary should appreciate their urgency for a quicker verdict on the Ayodhya dispute. "About Ayodhya, everybody knows that not only a particular political party, in this case BJP, but crores of Indians believe that judiciary should appreciate the element of urgency of the people, who on their part, expect a delivery of the verdict sooner than later," party national vice president Vinay Sahasrabuddhe said.

    09:59 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ram Mandir hearing: About Babri Masjid

    The Babri Masjid was a mosque in Ayodhya. It was constructed by Mughal emperor Babur in 1528-29 ath the site where Loed Ram was born. The mosque was constructed after demolishing a grand temple of Lord Ram. The mosque was one of the largest mosques in Uttar Pradesh and known as Masjid-i-Janmasthan (the mosque of the birthplace) before 1940.

    09:46 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Centre wants to return undisputed land to Ram Janambhoomi Nyas

    On January 29, the BJP-led Centre had moves plea in the Supreme Court to return undisputed 67.703 acres of land to the Ram Janambhoomi Nyas. The government claimed that only 0.313 acre of land was disputed on which the structure stood before it was demolished in 1992.

    09:30 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Congress promises to build Ram temple if it wins elections

    The Congress party has promised to launch sincere efforts to build a grand Ram Mandir in Ayodhya if it comes to power after the Lok Sabha elections. "On two previous occasions, the Congress made sincere attempts to build the Ram temple when it was in power. We will sincerely launch efforts to build the Ram temple if we come to power," Congress general secretary Harish Rawat said.

    09:16 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid Case Live: SC likely to decide schedule for final hearing

    The Supreme Court is likely to decide the schedule for the final hearing of case today. The case is pending before the top court for last 9 years. The Allahabad High Court had in 2010 bifurcated the disputed land equally among the three parties.

    08:53 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    What is Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title case

    The Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title case dispute pertains to the ownership od 2.77 acres of land in Uttar Padesh's Ayodhya where, according to Hindus, Lord Ram was born in Treta Yug. At the same place, Babur who was the founder and first Emperor of the Mughal dynasty in India, constructed a mosque in 15th century -- Babri Masjid after demolishing a temple. The structure was, hiwever, demolished by kar sevaks in 1992. The incident had led to nation-wide communal riots.

    08:43 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid case gearing LIVE Updates: Why delay in Supreme Court

    Last year, the Supreme Court had attracted controversy for the delays in hearing. In October, the court had said no to an urgent hearing and posted the matter for hearing in January 2019. But on January 4, the court heard the case for nearly 60 seconds and adjourned it January 10. On January 10, when the bench met, Justice UU Lalit recused himself from hearing and the hearing was adjourned again. On January 25, a new constitution bench was constituted but the case was adjourned again on January 29 due to Justice SA Bobde's unavailability. The case will come up before the court on Tuesday.

    07:48 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Ayodhya case Live verdict: Adityanath says PM Modi can turn impossible into possible

    Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath on last Friday reiterated that Ram temple is a matter of faith. He said that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has the capability of changing impossible into possible. "You take it from me ... Narendra Modi is the name of turning impossible into possible," he said.

    07:44 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    Seer performs symbolic 'shilanyas' of Ram temple in Kashi

    Last week, Jyotish and Dwarka Sharda Peeth Shankracharya Swamy Swaroopanand Saraswati performed a symbolic 'shilanyaas' in Varanasi of the Ram temple. The Shankracharya placed silver miniature bricks at the Kedar Ghat on the banks of the Ganga after which the 'shilanyas' was performed of a model of the proposed Ram temple.

    07:29 (IST)26 Feb 2019
    About Allahabad High Court 2010 verdict

    On September 30 2010, a Special Full Bench of the Allahabad High Court had ruled that the disputed land in Ayodhya shall be divided into three parts. While a two-thirds portion was awarded to two Hindu plaintiffs (Lord Ram and Nirmohi Akhara), the one-third was given to the Sunni Muslim Waqf Board.

    Ram Mandir case to come up for hearing in Supreme Court today.The Allahabad High Court in its verdict pronounced in September 2010 equally bifurcated the disputed 2.77 acres of land among the three involved parties -- Nirmohi Akhara, Ram Lalla and Sunni Waqf Board. A total of 14 appeals were filed in the Supreme Court against the 2010 judgment. On January 29, the Centre had the apex court seeking its permission to return the 67 acres of undisputed acquired land around the disputed site to the Ram Janambhoomi Nyas. The 0.313 acre area, where the disputed Babri Masjid once stood, is a part of 2.77-acre disputed premises. The disputed structure was demolished by kar sevaks on December 6, 1992. At that time, then government had acquired 67.703 acres, including the 2.77-acre plot, through a legislation in 1993. The Ram Janambhoomi Nyas (RJN) is the owner of as much as 42 acres of the acquired non-disputed land.
    Next Stories
    1Car used in Pulwama convoy attack sold just 10 days before bombing, owner missing
    2SP-BSP in talks to expand the pre-poll alliance beyond three states
    3DDA housing scheme 2019: Online process soon for 10,300 houses under different categories