Attorney General urges Supreme Court to reverse ‘skin to skin’ contact verdict in POCSO case

By: |
Updated: August 24, 2021 3:55 PM

Calling the judgment a “dangerous and outrageous precedent”, the Attorney General urged the Supreme Court to reverse the impugned verdict.

The bench during the hearing observed that the appellant had voted in favour of the resolution plan.The bench during the hearing observed that the appellant had voted in favour of the resolution plan.

Attorney General of India KK Venugopal on Tuesday urged the Supreme Court to reverse the controversial decision by the Bombay High Court which held that the offence of sexual assault under the POCSO Act will not be attracted there is no direct “skin-to-skin contact” between the accused the victim child, The Indian Express reported. 

Calling the judgment a “dangerous and outrageous precedent”, the Attorney General urged the Supreme Court to reverse the impugned verdict, stating that the judge had failed to see “the far-reaching consequences” of the verdict, the report added. 

In January this year, a man facing sexual assault charges was acquitted by the Nagpur bench of Bombay High Court on the grounds that pressing the breasts of a child over her clothes with direct “skin to skin” contact does not constitute “sexual assault” under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act.

“If tomorrow a person wears a pair of surgical gloves and feels the entire body of a woman, he won’t be punished for sexual assault as per this judgment. This is outrageous. Saying that skin-to-skin contact is required would mean a person wearing gloves getting an acquittal,” Venugopal was quoted by The Indian Express as saying.

A bench comprising Justices UU Lalit and Ajay Rastogi was hearing a plea filed by Venugopal challenging Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala’s judgment.

The high court had reversed the decision of a sessions court, which had convicted a 39-year-old man under Section 8 of the POCSO Act, and sentenced him to three years in jail. Section 8 prescribes the punishment for the offence of sexual assault defined in Section 7 of the Act.

In her verdict, Justice Pushpa V Ganediwala said: “As such, there is no direct physical contact i.e. skin to skin with sexual intent without penetration”. The bench observed that “the act of pressing breast can be a criminal force to a woman/ girl with the intention to outrage her modesty.”

On January 27, the Supreme Court had stayed the Bombay High Court order. The National Commission for Women also filed a separate appeal against the judgment. On August 6, the Supreme Court had appointed Senior Advocate Siddharth Dave as an amicus curiae in the matter.

Get live Stock Prices from BSE, NSE, US Market and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, Check out latest IPO News, Best Performing IPOs, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

Financial Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel and stay updated with the latest Biz news and updates.

Next Stories
1Deadlock between Centre and farmers can end only through settlement, not in court: Rakesh Tikait
2Bharat Bandh: Normal life hit in Punjab, Haryana as farmers block highways, rail tracks; no major impact in other states
3Sushil Modi says Narendra Modi India’s only PM to also serve as CM, gets schooled on Twitter