Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal today apparently blamed Punjab loss to EVMs.
A day after requesting the Election Commission to conduct the upcoming MCD elections in Delhi with ballot papers, instead of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), chief minister Arvind Kejriwal apparently blamed Punjab loss to the polling machines. Claiming foul play in the polls, Kejriwal said that 20-25% AAP votes were transferred to SAD-BJP combine. Or else, he asked, “How Akalis got more vote than us”.
During the recently concluded elections in Punjab, Kejriwal’s Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) could get only 20 seats and its vote share was around 23%. The SAD-BJP won 18 seats with around 31% vote share. Before the polls, AAP had claimed it would sweep Punjab. However, the results came as a shocker even as the party had started celebrations before the final results were announced. AAP was also routed in Goa as it couldn’t win a single seat.
Prior to Kejriwal, BSP supremo Mayawati had alleged EVM tampering by the BJP in Uttar Pradesh and blamed this for her party’s shock defeat in the state.
By claiming that BJP manipulated the EVMs, these leaders are directly questioning the authenticity of the Election Commission, which is an autonomous body powered by the Constitution to conduct elections in the country. And this is another dangerous trend, among many, started by the likes of Kejriwal.
As per the Election Commission, EVMs cannot be tampered with and all necessary measures are taken into consideration. Leaders like Kejriwal and Mayawati should at least listen to what the EC has to say, instead of misleading the voters.
Here is how the EC busted Mayawati’s claim of EVM manipulation. Kejriwal and the rest of the Opposition should read about it:
- For the record, India has been successfully using EVM since 2000 and it was first introduced on a pilot basis way back in 1982. In past, courts have hailed the EVMs. In 2001, Madras High Court had rejected the allegations that the poll machine can be tampered with. In 2002, the Kerala High Court had upheld the use of EVMs, while in 2004, the Karanataka High Court had hailed the EVMs as “national pride”. In 2005, the Mumbai High Court had also concluded that EVMs can’t be tampered with.
- For technical security, the machine is both mechanically and electronically protected to prevent any tampering/manipulation. The software used in these machines is burnt into a One Time programmable/Masked chip (Hardware) so that it cannot be altered or tampered with. Further, these machines are not networked either by wire or by wireless to any other machine or system.
- The software of EVMs is developed in-house by BEL, a Defence Ministry PSU, and ECILan Atomic Energy Ministry’s PSU independently’.
- The vote can be recorded by an elector from the ballot unit only after the Presiding Officer enables the ballot on the Control Unit, the machine does not receive any signal from outside at any time.
- During production in the factory, functional testing is done by production group as per the laid down quality plan and performance test procedures.
- Samples of EVMs from production batches are regularly checked for functionality by Quality Assurance Group, which is an independent unit within the manufacturing firms.
- Certain additional features were introduced in 2006 in ECI-EVMs such as dynamic coding between Ballot Unit and Control Unit, installation of real time clock, installation of full display system and date and time stamping of every key pressing in EVM’s Complete Procedural Security.
- The Commission has put in place an elaborate administrative system of measures and procedural checks-and-balances aimed at prevention of any possible misuse or procedural lapses.These safeguards are implemented transparently with the involvement of political parties, candidates and their representatives at every stage to build their confidence on efficacy and reliability of EVMs, so they are actually representatives of electors.
- Before every election, a first level checking (FLC) is done for every EVM to be used in the election by the engineers of the manufacturers in the presence of political parties’ representatives. Any malfunctioning EVM is kept separately and is not used in the election.
- Manufacturers certify at the time of FLC that all components in the EVM are original. After this, the plastic cabinet of Control Unit of the EVM is sealed using a “Pink PaperSeal”, which is signed by representatives of political parties. After this, the plastic cabinet of the control unit of the EVMs cannot be opened and there is no access to any component inside of EVMs.
- At the time of FLC, at least 1000 votes are cast by the representatives on 5% of EVMs randomly selected by them. A printout of the results of the mock poll as well as a sequential print out of every vote polled during the mock poll at the time of First Level Checking of EVMs are taken out for at least 5% of EVMs and shown to the representatives of political parties. Representatives of political parties are allowed to pick machines randomly for this purpose. In rest of the machines, the number of votes polled during the mock poll are to the satisfaction of the representatives of political parties. Representatives of political parties are allowed to do mock poll themselves.
- Subsequently, EVMs are further randomized twice once for allocation of machines to assembly constituencies and second to polling stations in the presence of candidates or their representatives before they are distributed for use in individual polling stations.Such lists of EVM containing serial number of EVM allocated to particular polling station are provided to the political parties/candidates.
- Candidates and their representatives are allowed to conduct mock polls on EVMs at the time of candidate setting and also before the actual poll on the poll day to satisfy themselves about the satisfactory functioning of EVMs being used.
- Once the candidate setting is done the Ballot Unit of the EVM is also sealed with thread/Pink Paper seals so that nobody has access to the inside of the Ballot Unit too.These Pink seals also bear signatures of representatives of political parties/candidate.
- A printout of the results of the mock poll, as well as a sequential print out of every vote polled during the mock poll at the time of preparation of EVMs and candidate setting, are also taken out for at least 5o/o of EVMs and shown to the representatives of political parties. Representatives of political parties are allowed to pick machines randomly for this purpose.
- On the poll day, a mock poll by casting at least 50 votes is conducted at every polling stations in the presence of the representatives of the candidates/polling agents with their signature and a certificate to that effect is obtained from every presiding 0fficer.
- After the mock poll is over, another thread seal and green paper seals are put on the EVM to block access to all buttons on the EVM’ except those’ which are used for the conduct of the poll. These paper seals and thread seals are allowed to be signed by the polling agents. After the poll is over, the Presiding officer presses the “Close” button on the EVM in the presence of polling agents. Thereafter, no votes can be polled in the EVM”
- After this, the entire EVM is sealed. Candidates and their agents are allowed to put their signatures on the seals, which they can check for the intactness of the seal before counting.
- In addition to this, the strong rooms where EVMs are stored’ pending for counting are also sealed and watched round the clock. The candidates and their representatives area*owed to put their own seals on the strong rooms. They are also allowed to keep a watch around the clock on the strong room.
- The representatives of candidates of all political parties are given opportunity to participate in all the above occasion of FLC, preparation of EVMs before poll, mock poll etc’