​​ ​
  1. Services, industry push needed for job creation: Arvind Panagariya

Services, industry push needed for job creation: Arvind Panagariya

NITI Aayog vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya said even Indian farmers and their children recognize the superior prospects offered by faster-growing industry and services.

By: | New Delhi | Updated: May 19, 2015 7:40 AM
NITI Aayog, niti aayog arvind, arvind panagariya, arvind panagariya niti aayog, agriculture, agriculture in India, employment, employment news, industrial sector, industrial sector in India, services sector in india, farmers, farmers in India

NITI Aayog vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya said even Indian farmers and their children recognize the superior prospects offered by faster-growing industry and services. (PTI)

Owing to limited potential of the agriculture sector in bringing prosperity to a vast population in the long run, the country should emphasise on creating more employment in industrial and services sectors, NITI Aayog vice-chairman Arvind Panagariya said on Monday.

In his first blog published on the newly launched portal of NITI Aayog, Panagariya said with the share of agriculture in the country’s GDP at about 15 per cent currently, the workforce employed in the farm sector is significantly poorer than the other half employed in industry and services.

The Aayog vice-chairman said even Indian farmers and their children recognize the superior prospects offered by faster-growing industry and services. He cited a recent survey by the NGO Lokniti, wherein 62 per cent of all farmers said they would quit farming if they got a job in the city. As for their children, 76 per cent say they would like to take a profession other than farming, the survey said. “But in the longer run, the potential of agriculture to bring prosperity to a vast population remains limited. In sum, agricultural growth and expansion of good jobs in industry and services can go hand-in-hand to bring rapid elimination of poverty and shared prosperity for all,” Panagariya said.

Unless workers have the opportunity to migrate to better paid jobs in these sectors, they will be unable to fully share in the prosperity experienced by a fast-growing economy, the Aayong vice-chairman pointed out. He cited that in South Korea and Taiwan prosperity was widely shared during the 1960s and 1970s because workers in agriculture could migrate to good jobs in industry and services. Panagariya said the government’s Make in India campaign provided the umbrella for many of the Centre’s initiatives in this connection.

“…In countries experiencing growth rates of 6 per cent or more over long periods… industry and services have grown substantially faster than agriculture… In this context that the creation of good jobs in industry and services is critically important,” he added.

Using the instrumentality of cooperative federalism, the government has encouraged states to undertake labour law reforms to stimulate jobs and states like Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh have taken the lead in this area. The Centre intends to consolidate 44 Central labour laws into five while introducing important employment-friendly reforms, the Aayog vice-chairman said.

The government has also greatly cut the inspector raj by introducing a portal that allows MSMEs to comply with 16 Central labour laws through self-certification. Any inspections are performed via a computer generated random selection, he said. Under a recent initiative, 1.4 million workers aged 35 or younger from households having completed 100 days of work during 2014-15 under the NREGA scheme, would be imparted skills to enable them avail of urban employment opportunities, Panagariya said.

Seeking to dispel a common fear that expansion of industry and services would divert land away from agriculture thereby undermining food security, the Aayog vice-chairman said this view overlooks the fact that area under non-agricultural use, which includes housing, industry, offices, roads, railways and other similar items, was only 8 per cent in 2011-12. Fifteen years earlier, in 1997-98, this proportion was 7 per cent. Accelerated growth over these 15 years facilitated by the 1 percentage point increase in non-agricultural use of land has produced more gains in per-capita income and poverty reduction than what had been achieved over the entire 50 preceding years.

For Updates Check Economy News; follow us on Facebook and Twitter

Get live Stock Prices from BSE and NSE and latest NAV, portfolio of Mutual Funds, calculate your tax by Income Tax Calculator, know market’s Top Gainers, Top Losers & Best Equity Funds. Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter.

  1. B
    biemes
    May 19, 2015 at 11:28 am
    It is surprising that NA VC (so also eminent personalities like GC Das etc.) has towed the line of Modi Sarkar, in supporting job creation in non-agriculture sectors at the cost of agriculture sector. No one in India should forget and ignore the agriculture revolution of 60-70, when India became self-sufficient in domestic food production, which we need forever to feed ever growing potion. The productivity, mechanization & production, income to farmers should increase to attract more people to this sector. Efforts & policies of NA and the government should be toward this objectives. Read my article about Land Reforms at NA and Modi Sarkar is driven by Indian Business Cl (IBC) who is at the root of all the evils that our country is facing. IBC wants � Interest rates to come down (as per HVK, 200 B%P) so that profits can jump up. FM Jaitley also wants this to happen. IBC’s policy is to business with high profit margins (lower volumes), unlike China and many other countries where business is done at higher volumes & lower profit margins. India with its large potion offers opportunities to business with large volumes. � Tax incentives so that their profits can rise, at the cost of higher fiscal deficit. On the other hand they want subsidies to be removed to reduce fiscal deficit. This is thoroughly selfish atude of IBC. � Cheaper land for their projects in the name of more jobs. Can NA or anyone guarantee this? IBC is known for acquiring land for industrial project and using the same for housing. Why IBC is not taking up/partiting any infrastructure project? Because they do not find huge profit margin in them and for this they want cheap, land, cheap money. IBC is known for large NPA of PS banks, which is putting so much pressure on public finance. Why Modi Sarkar is not bringing such IB companies to books and quickly recover banks money. If required laws should be changed to do this. Will anyone in Modi Sarkar/NA tell IBC to reduce prices of their products, now that USD/Rupee rate & crude oil prices are down. IBC took the fullest opportunity to raise prices when USD/Rupee and crude oil prices increased. Let PM Modi/NA VC move in grain/vegetable markets to know what the real inflation is today, instead of going by CPI/WPI numbers. IBC should buttering Modi Sarkar in the name of economic reforms and face the reality like its other non-business countrymen and take actions for the good and the larger interests of India.
    Reply

    Go to Top