Budget 2018: Finance minister Arun Jaitley has done well to clarify that the new health insurance scheme the Budget talks of will not involve getting hospitalized and then claiming a reimbursement since, as he said, this makes the scheme very messy – and, presumably, prone to abuse.
Budget 2018: Finance minister Arun Jaitley has done well to clarify that the new health insurance scheme the Budget talks of will not involve getting hospitalized and then claiming a reimbursement since, as he said, this makes the scheme very messy – and, presumably, prone to abuse. Where the plan gets problematic, however, is in not wanting to charge the 10 crore households that will be covered under it. Even if the poor don’t pay much, once they do, this gives them ownership and is the only way to ensure they will demand service from those running it. That is why, for all other insurance schemes begun by the government, including that for life insurance, make the poor contribute towards the premium. Why this one should be any different is not clear.
While the government has finally come out with a figure, of around Rs 1,000-1,200 per family for the proposed plan – had this been announced earlier, it would have prevented speculation on the costs – it underscores just how vital it is to structure the programme right. The RSBY costs around Rs 500-600 per person but gives just a Rs 30,000 cover against the Rs 5 lakh in the new one – does this mean RSBY was a rip off or that, increasing the number of families insured from 3.6 crore (for RSBY) to 10 crore makes the premium fall so dramatically?
Since the new plan is loosely modeled on Karnataka’s Yeshasvini – the total value of surgeries allowed under the scheme are worth more than Rs 5 lakh – it would do well to learn from that scheme. It goes without saying, that with such large volumes, the government has to negotiate the best deal for all operations, possibly to 30-40% of commercial rates available.
Know how to calculate your income tax: Income tax calculator
Healthcare experts, however, say that if the scheme is not restricted to select surgical procedures, its costs can quickly spiral out of control. A person suffering from dengue also needs hospitalization, but if such illnesses are to be included in the scheme, there will be no stopping and it is difficult to set protocols for too many varied diseases; exotic ailments like a cochlear implant have to be kept out since, a hearing aid can often do much the same thing at a fraction of the cost. While the government can pay for the surgery, it can use its bargaining power to ensure, for instance, that all OPD facilities will be 50% cheaper for those covered – that way, patients get a benefit but the system is less prone to abuse. Equally critical, the scheme has to be accompanied by intensive primary care facilities. Clearly insurance companies lose if more patients get operated and, if they do, they will jack up the premium – but if there is intensive monitoring of patients to ensure they have their check-ups and take their medicines on time, this will lower surgery costs. While the finance secretary has said that either an insurance or a trust model can be followed, Yeshasvini is administered by the government directly, to keep costs low and to closely monitor the scheme. The new scheme has to benefit the poor, not make private hospitals salivate at the mouth.