That perception may be largely true, but not entirely so. Consider Muhammad Yunus, who won the Nobel Peace Prize last October. His Grameen Bank, founded in 1976 in Bangladesh, has offered tiny loans to some of the poorest people in the world, helping to lift many borrowers out of poverty. The Bank made a profit and grew over the years - and has inspired similar microcredit schemes elsewhere.
But was money Yunuss ultimate motive In interviews, he reveals that he was actually motivated by a deep sympathy for the plight of the poor in his country. His goal of building a profitable lending business seems to have reflected his desire to believe in the trustworthiness of his clients. He tried to make a profit in microfinance in order to prove these neglected peoples creditworthiness, so that he could continue lending to them. Paradoxically, then, while Yunus was pursuing profit, he was apparently not doing it for the money. And there are others within the field of finance who are similarly motivated.
Indeed, the history of financial institutions for low-income people is largely a history of philanthropic or idealistic movements, not just activities focused entirely on the bottom line. The cooperative movement of the 19th and 20th centuries was associated with a long list of financial and insurance institutions to help less-advantaged people.
Such philanthropic finance continues today. Peter Tufano, a finance professor at Harvard Business School, has quietly been doing non-profit work with the foundation he created, Doorways to Dreams, to help low-income people improve their financial prospects. As far as I can determine, he doesnt seem to care about making money for himself.
While Yunus was pursuing profit, paradoxically, he was not doing it for the money. Likewise, Tufanos Doorways to Dreams
Tufano approaches the problem with real sympathy for these people, and a realistic idea about how to help them: premium savings bonds. In addition to normal interest payments, these bonds have an attached lottery - an enticement to keep the money in savings. Low-income people manifestly enjoy lotteries, and they will acquire the habit of looking forward to the lottery dates, which will deter them from cashing in their bonds. But if a real emergency arises, they can get their money. In fact, lottery bonds have a long history. In 1694, the English government issued a 10% 16-year bond called the Million Adventure, which awarded prizes randomly each year to its holders. Likewise, Harold MacMillans government created a lottery bonds program in the UK in 1956. The program was controversial at first: many viewed it as immoral, because of its connection with gambling. But the program has grown, and today premium bonds have a place in the saving portfolio of 23 million people, almost 40% of the UK population.
But, while such bonds have succeeded in raising savings rates in the countries that have created them, they have not had advocates in the US. Tufano is the first to admit that some of the best ideas for financial innovation are very old. They may get lost for a while, and initially they may sound strange when they are rediscovered, but people like Yunus and Tufano show that they can be updated and implemented with the help of disinterested but passionate advocacy. Their inherent spirit of goodwill holds out the hope of a brighter future to everyone, especially those most in need.
Robert J Shiller is Professor of Economics at Yale University, Chief Economist at MacroMarkets LLC
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2007