1. India’s refusal to join China’s One Belt and One Road initiative regrettable: Chinese media

India’s refusal to join China’s One Belt and One Road initiative regrettable: Chinese media

India's refusal to join China's high-profile Belt and Road initiative is "regrettable" but New Delhi's boycott will not at all affect the cooperation in infrastructure development among its neighbouring countries, a report in a state-run newspaper said today.

By: | Beijing | Updated: May 15, 2017 9:15 AM
On Saturday, Pakistan and China inked new deals worth nearly USD 500 million, covering airport, port and highway construction. (AP)

India’s refusal to join China’s high-profile Belt and Road initiative is “regrettable” but New Delhi’s boycott will not at all affect the cooperation in infrastructure development among its neighbouring countries, a report in a state-run newspaper said today.

The two-day Belt and Road Forum which is being attended by leaders from 29 countries, including Pakistan, has been boycotted by India due to sovereignty concerns over the USD 50 billion CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor), which passes through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir.

“While India recently issued an official statement saying it would not be part of the “One Belt and One Road” (B&R) initiative, it will not affect the trend towards cooperation in infrastructure development among its neighbouring countries at all,” Global Times reported today.

“India was openly sceptical of China’s Belt and Road Forum (BRF) hours ahead of the opening of the event, mainly due to concerns over the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), a key project of the B&R, and whether it might influence the disputed Kashmir region,” it said.

Also Read| China’s One Belt One Road Summit: From India’s absence to US, Russia, Pakistan’s presence, here are 10 developments so far

The B&R is a grand economic cooperation and development plan open to everyone, and is aimed at improving infrastructure in countries along the B&R route, thus benefiting the local people, it said.

“China would never force any country to participate in the B&R if it was too sceptical and nervous to do so. It is regrettable but not a problem that India still maintains its strong opposition to the B&R, even though China has repeatedly said its position on the Kashmir dispute would not change because of the CPEC,” the article said.

Map showing the projects subsumed under One Belt, One Road program by China.

Referring to the statement issued by the Ministry of External Affairs on March 13, a day before the two-day B&R summit, it said India also cited the potential debt burden as one of its other concerns, saying that, “connectivity initiatives must follow the principles of financial responsibility to avoid projects that would create an unsustainable debt burden for communities.”

Also Read| Counter to China’s One Belt One Road policy? India plans to develop roads in neighboring countries to strengthen its position

“It is strange that the onlooker is more anxious than the players. While India cares about its neighbours’ debt burden, the neighbours appear willing to take on more,” it said.

On Saturday, Pakistan and China inked new deals worth nearly USD 500 million, covering airport, port and highway construction, it said.

“As regards the potential debt burden, Pakistan’s repayments will peak at around USD 5 billion in 2022, but this will be offset by transit fees charged in the CPEC,” it quoted a media report and referred to Nepal officially signing a deal with China to join the B&R with plans to build a cross-border rail link that may cost up to USD 8 billion.

The article further stated that given the active responses from countries along the route, there is no way for India to impede its neighboring countries from cooperating with China in infrastructure development.

“China has formally invited India to join the B&R. If India doesn’t want to take a part on the stage, then it should just be a good member of the audience. The role is still available if India changes its mind, but it may only be a small role if it is left too late,” it said.

  1. U
    Usha
    May 15, 2017 at 4:34 pm
    Though cooperation always benefits both side, but in this case I fell India decision at this stage is correct. China is on the most unfavorable side for trade with Europe, Middle East and Africa as compared to India's geographical location. China is dying to have cheaper land routes for trading, because sea route through Singapore is time taking and expensive. India has so far not taken much advantage over China though having great edge for shorter trade distances from these places. China has to make huge investment through CPEC, though India has complete port facility on western coastal side. India should realize and take timely advantage of its geographical location and make strategic plans accordingly and can act as link with eastern nations.
    Reply
    1. S
      Srinivasulu Mekala
      May 15, 2017 at 11:17 am
      The analogy of player and onlooker is wrong, it is the horse and the punter analogy that suits. The "flagship" of the BRF, when the repayment of it peaks in 2022, will be mired in a massive war or will be in the hands of its rightful owner. India knows that. If the flagship is captured, symbolically all ships surrender.
      Reply

      Go to Top